Teams

BM RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs LEBTC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Wadsworth / Lisa Brinker vs Johanna Neucks / Monica Panczer3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Moxon vs Kimberlee Harmon6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Bivens / Kimberly Sperry vs Janee Wren / Davinia Lyon6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Hoffman / Kimberly Picchietti vs Robyn Jensen / Deborah Jenson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-07-13vs KC GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Wadsworth / Molly Blake vs Carissa Hollander / Nathalia Urbano7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Brinker / Catherine Rollhaus vs Gina Schulz / Cheryl Amador6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Sperry / Diana Collins vs Ashley Barto / Lisa Luong1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-12vs CK PURPLEWon 21
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Bivens / Beth Hoffman vs Jodie Wang / Su Zemla3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Rollhaus / Lisa Brinker vs Audrey Bruce / Lisa Massicotte6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNeha Sitole / Kimberly Picchietti vs Anne Ross / Marie Grossman6-1, 6-4
2021-07-06vs SSLGT GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Rakowski / Molly Blake vs Kate Perreault / Lindsey Sittko6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Brinker / Catherine Rollhaus vs Tonya Mazurek / Claire Koran7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Bivens / Neha Sitole vs Patti Knepper / Amy Leonard6-2, 6-3
2021-06-28vs LEBTC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesMolly Blake / Jill Rakowski vs Jennifer Flint / Johanna Neucks3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNeha Sitole / Kimberly Sperry vs Kimberlee Harmon / Monica Panczer0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Rollhaus / Diana Collins vs Bethana Kuchenbecker / Deborah Jenson3-6, 3-6
2021-06-22vs PH BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJill Rakowski / Sarah Wadsworth vs Libby Conlin / Lori Silliman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Moxon vs Jennifer Parsons6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Bivens / Molly Blake vs Beth Wright / Alisa Kennedy7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Collins / Kimberly Picchietti vs Joyce Anderson / Amy Attwood5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-08vs KC GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Blake / Jennifer Moxon vs Jennifer Gonyea / Alexis Rubin1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNeha Sitole / Diana Collins vs Christine Angelini / Nathalia Urbano6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Hoffman / Kimberly Picchietti vs Cheryl Amador / Gina Schulz6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Adrienne Bivens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Jennifer Moxon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Molly Blake
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.88
Neha Sitole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Catherine Rollhaus
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Sarah Wadsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Kimberly Picchietti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Kimberly Sperry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Diana Collins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jill Rakowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Brinker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neha Sitole + Adrienne Bivens6264% games+22.1% vs expected
Catherine Rollhaus + Jill Rakowski7162% games+13.4% vs expected
Kimberly Picchietti + Adrienne Bivens5157% games+7.5% vs expected
Sarah Wadsworth + Catherine Rollhaus2349% games+4.1% vs expected
Neha Sitole + Kimberly Picchietti4347% games+2.7% vs expected
Sarah Wadsworth + Jill Rakowski16757% games+2.2% vs expected
Diana Collins + Kimberly Picchietti3245% games−1.0% vs expected
Kimberly Sperry + Kimberly Picchietti4649% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adrienne Bivens
96W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
Jennifer Moxon
44W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Molly Blake
34W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Neha Sitole
60W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Catherine Rollhaus
40W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Wadsworth
64W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Kimberly Picchietti
34W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Kimberly Sperry
23W–50L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Diana Collins
24W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%70%30%
2.43
Jill Rakowski
31W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Brinker
20W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.