Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs BM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJohanna Neucks / Monica Panczer vs Sarah Wadsworth / Lisa Brinker6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKimberlee Harmon vs Jennifer Moxon2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanee Wren / Davinia Lyon vs Adrienne Bivens / Kimberly Sperry1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobyn Jensen / Deborah Jenson vs Beth Hoffman / Kimberly Picchietti4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-07-17vs KC GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesBethana Kuchenbecker / Robyn Jensen vs Christine Angelini / Nathalia Urbano6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKimberlee Harmon vs Susanna Evans2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Jenson / Jennifer Flint vs Jennifer Gonyea / Ashley Barto4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavinia Lyon / Janee Wren vs Lisa Luong / Lay Chan6-3, 7-6
2021-07-13vs SSLGT GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesJohanna Neucks / Deborah Jenson vs Amy Noverr / Brooke Wagner6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBethana Kuchenbecker vs Lindsey Sittko6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJanee Wren / Jennifer Flint vs Claire Koran / Tonya Mazurek5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavinia Lyon / Monica Panczer vs Ymmy Carrington / Jackie Scherer6-2, 6-2
2021-07-06vs PH BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavinia Lyon / Jennifer Flint vs Libby Conlin / Lori Silliman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohanna Neucks vs Tracy Wells6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMonica Panczer / Robyn Jensen vs Heather la Montagne / Prairie Robinson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanee Wren / Deborah Jenson vs Lisa Dreiling / Alisa Kennedy3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-06-28vs BM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Flint / Johanna Neucks vs Molly Blake / Jill Rakowski6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJanee Wren vs Beth Hoffman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberlee Harmon / Monica Panczer vs Neha Sitole / Kimberly Sperry6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBethana Kuchenbecker / Deborah Jenson vs Catherine Rollhaus / Diana Collins6-3, 6-3
2021-06-22vs CK PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohanna Neucks / Monica Panczer vs Nancy Railey-Borchelt / Su Zemla6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBethana Kuchenbecker / Kimberlee Harmon vs Amee Auberry / Renee Martinez6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanee Wren / Jennifer Flint vs Liz Contadeluci / Lisa Massicotte6-1, 6-3
2021-06-08vs SSLGT GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesJanee Wren / Jennifer Flint vs Kate Perreault / Claire Koran7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKimberlee Harmon vs Brooke Wagner6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBethana Kuchenbecker / Robyn Jensen vs Amy Leonard / Jackie Scherer6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMonica Panczer / Johanna Neucks vs Patti Knepper / Wendy How6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Johanna Neucks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.20
Bethana Kuchenbecker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.96
Monica Panczer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Robyn Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Davinia Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Janee Wren
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Deborah Jenson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Kimberlee Harmon
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Jennifer Flint
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janee Wren + Monica Panczer8164% games+9.6% vs expected
Bethana Kuchenbecker + Monica Panczer5363% games+9.6% vs expected
Deborah Jenson + Johanna Neucks9068% games+9.2% vs expected
Monica Panczer + Robyn Jensen14165% games+7.5% vs expected
Bethana Kuchenbecker + Robyn Jensen16367% games+7.0% vs expected
Davinia Lyon + Monica Panczer4162% games+5.3% vs expected
Jennifer Flint + Monica Panczer8457% games+4.5% vs expected
Jennifer Flint + Janee Wren12561% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Johanna Neucks
92W–44L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Bethana Kuchenbecker
110W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Monica Panczer
84W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
2.96
Robyn Jensen
88W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Davinia Lyon
92W–68L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Janee Wren
156W–105L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Deborah Jenson
47W–24L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberlee Harmon
49W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Jennifer Flint
46W–32L career · 6 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.