Teams

Brookwood Manor (Sally Rector)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.5 (3 Lines of Doubles - NO SINGLES)

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs Mountain Park (Melanie Freeman)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGeorgiana Britt / Julie Kable vs DESILEE BAIN / Judy Luong2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNatasha Jordan / Wanda Loggins vs Melanie Freeman / Kim Wurapa1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSally Rector / Stephanie Brake vs Adrienne Brown / Aldith Mckain2-6, 2-6
2025-07-08vs Sugar Creek (Dianna Kelly)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Kable / Georgiana Britt vs Wanda Haywood / Audrey Sherrod1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWanda Loggins / Sally Rector vs Lagaylia Appleby / Tracy Booker1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Ott / Denise Martin vs Andrea Nay-Richardson / Monique Brown2-6, 2-6
2025-07-01vs Autumn Lakes Bethesda (Mimi Su)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Adams / Georgiana Britt vs Terri Tran / Kimberly Nevetral3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNatasha Jordan / Wanda Loggins vs Mimi Su / Tran Huynh2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Haddox / Stephanie Brake vs Hong Vu / Oanh Tran2-6, 2-6
2025-06-24vs Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Chambers / Natasha Jordan vs Karen Webb-Smith / Marsha Johnson6-7, 1-2
L#2 DoublesWanda Loggins / Anne Haddox vs Tiffany Baines / Vicki Speight1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Ott / Sally Rector vs Kerana Lee / Stephanie White1-6, 2-6
2025-06-18vs USTA Atlanta/Dana HarveyLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Martin / Georgiana Britt vs Adriane Ivey / Susan Norton2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarla Ott / Stephanie Brake vs Candace Coggins / Karen Coppins3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSuellen McRaney / Sally Rector vs Dana Harvey / Nayasha Mendez1-6, 1-6
2025-06-16vs Mountain Park (Melanie Freeman)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Kable / Margaret Chambers vs Gail Larkin / Chaundra Wright6-1, 6-7, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGeorgiana Britt / Bonny Robichaud vs Adrienne Brown / Aldith Mckain6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDenise Martin / Natasha Jordan vs Camelia Coleman / Betty Ralston4-6, 6-4, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · 3.5 (3 Lines of Doubles - NO SINGLES)
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Lynnessa Snodgrass
published
3.26
Julie Kable
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Denise Martin
published 3.5
3.17
Bonny Robichaud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Debbie Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Natasha Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Stephanie Brake
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Georgiana Britt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Wanda Loggins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Carla Ott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Anne Haddox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Suellen McRaney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Sally Rector
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Glenda Smith
published
Margaret Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Yvonne Roberts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suellen McRaney + Anne Haddox161252% games+4.3% vs expected
Anne Haddox + Wanda Loggins81150% games−1.1% vs expected
Debbie Adams + Bonny Robichaud61045% games−7.2% vs expected
Anne Haddox + Stephanie Brake1435% games−15.1% vs expected
Glenda Smith + Suellen McRaney0618% gamesnot enough data
Glenda Smith + Yvonne Roberts0626% gamesnot enough data
Julie Kable + Stephanie Brake4163% gamesnot enough data
Suellen McRaney + Yvonne Roberts224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynnessa Snodgrass
31W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Julie Kable
10W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Denise Martin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Bonny Robichaud
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Debbie Adams
19W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Natasha Jordan
12W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
Stephanie Brake
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Georgiana Britt
16W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Wanda Loggins
96W–112L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Carla Ott
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Anne Haddox
64W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Suellen McRaney
34W–70L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Sally Rector
0W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.69
Glenda Smith
22W–52L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Chambers
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yvonne Roberts
20W–33L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.