Teams

Foxworth (Nicole Rothwell)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.5 (3 Lines of Doubles - NO SINGLES)

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-22vs St Marlo (Shriya Diskalkar)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesMegan Kim / Katy Cleveland vs Ashmali Henriques / Amy Conti6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJana Dufresne / Nicole Rothwell vs Shriya Diskalkar / Krista Barley4-6, 3-6
2025-07-15vs WAF Rec (Patricia Nelson)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesDanielle Lawson / Heather Davis vs Tricia Krause / Margo Bryk6-3, 2-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Kim / Katy Cleveland vs Cherine Wojcik / Dana Hawker6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAubry Canales / Kristin Funt vs Angela Gorbett / Patricia Nelson6-4, 6-3
2025-07-08vs Wild Timber (Lindsay Hofmann)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Funt / Heather Davis vs Maribel Shields / Kat Ponzio6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanielle Lawson / Cathi Levinson vs Lindsay Hofmann / Ashley Hooie6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Rutledge / Nicole Rothwell vs Kinley Thomas / Mary Geil7-5, 6-1
2025-07-06vs Aviary (Jessica Wilson)*Won 20
W#2 DoublesDanielle Lawson / Jana Dufresne vs Kimberly Rodriguez Garcia / Leslie Glass6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Kippels / Julie Zurn vs Jenny Idichandy / Vanessa Schepis6-4, 6-7, 6-2
2025-06-30vs Deerlake (Stacy Decesaro)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Lawson / Cathi Levinson vs Kristyn Wakely / Meredith Borski6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Kippels / Aubry Canales vs Jenny Judkins / Gisella Etzion7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJana Dufresne / Kim Rutledge vs Marie Tutt / Rachel Allen7-5, 6-1
2025-06-24vs Medlock Bridge (Amy Jackson)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesKaty Cleveland / Megan Kim vs Karen Jones / Patricia Harriman6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Rothwell / Kim Rutledge vs Mary Kuo / Pally La6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDanielle Lawson / Amy Kippels vs Melanie Rodrigue / Susan Rossin6-1, 6-2
2025-06-10vs USTA Atlanta/Ann ChaLost 02
L#2 DoublesMegan Kim / Nevada Serra vs Stacy Mole / Soo Monahon2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Kippels / Jana Dufresne vs See Moua / Joy Anderson0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · 3.5 (3 Lines of Doubles - NO SINGLES)
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Danielle Lawson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Cathi Levinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Katy Cleveland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Kim Rutledge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Kristin Funt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Nevada Serra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Amy Kippels
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Aubry Canales
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Nicole Rothwell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Jana Dufresne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Julie Zurn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Shannon McMahon
published
Megan Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Zurn + Amy Kippels6258% games+10.4% vs expected
Kristin Funt + Danielle Lawson6263% games+9.6% vs expected
Megan Kim + Katy Cleveland5162% games+4.9% vs expected
Amy Kippels + Nevada Serra3355% gamesnot enough data
Cathi Levinson + Julie Zurn5078% gamesnot enough data
Kim Rutledge + Nicole Rothwell224 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Funt + Katy Cleveland314 matchesnot enough data
Katy Cleveland + Danielle Lawson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Lawson
57W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Cathi Levinson
64W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.55
Katy Cleveland
37W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kim Rutledge
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Kristin Funt
45W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38
Nevada Serra
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Amy Kippels
60W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Aubry Canales
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Nicole Rothwell
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jana Dufresne
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Julie Zurn
51W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Shannon McMahon
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
Megan Kim
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.