Teams

LKHA-Haynes/CSD SPARTAN 40+ 8.5 Sat

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Men 8.5 Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-09vs LDWI-Winton/LNRCWon 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Hawkins / Edward Bugg vs Charles Hayes / Daniel Winton6-4, 6-2
2024-10-01Won 20
W#2 DoublesScott Nestor / Kevin Hawkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAdam Labar / Rip Robbins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-28vs LLKI-King/HNPLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarryl Thompson / Zachary Stroupe vs Lance King / Mario Henry1-6, 2-6
2024-08-24vs LSRE-Reynolds/Peninsula 8.5MWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Kayton / Rip Robbins vs Norman Holmes / Louis Foreman6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Steven Kayton
published
4.26
Benjamin Keeney
published 4.5
4.21
Terry Gornet
published
4.21
Christopher Ehmcke
published 4.5
4.13
Darryl Thompson
published 4.5
4.12
Ravi Mujumdar
published
3.94
Kevin Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Zachary Stroupe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Kent Temple
published
3.88
Corey Cornacchio
published 4
3.81
Thomas Andrews
published
3.81
Adam Labar
published 4
3.71
Rip Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.52
Edward Bugg
published
3.18
Scott Nestor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zachary Stroupe + Kevin Hawkins7264% gamesnot enough data
Rip Robbins + Kevin Hawkins4359% gamesnot enough data
Steven Kayton + Thomas Andrews314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Kayton
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Benjamin Keeney
20W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
Terry Gornet
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Christopher Ehmcke
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Darryl Thompson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.13
Ravi Mujumdar
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Kevin Hawkins
117W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Zachary Stroupe
105W–48L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kent Temple
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Corey Cornacchio
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
Thomas Andrews
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Adam Labar
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Rip Robbins
79W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
Edward Bugg
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.52
Scott Nestor
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.