Teams

CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Hinsdale Cashman Sun 5 $20

CDTA ESL 40 & Over W · E

21 players · average NTRP 3.92 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesKelly O'Donnell / Ginger Riessen vs Cara Waddle / Desiree Witte5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Boruff / Kara Levin vs Pam Fisher / Julie Steinberg1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRamona Brorson / ELIZABETH JONES vs AnneMarie Geary / Bela Starkman4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesChristi Cashman / Carlene Motto vs Martha Lloyd / Hoda Elshakankery1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNgozi Ezike / Kelly O'Donnell vs Laurie Gray / Gayle Dominicis6-4, 5-3
W#3 DoublesCeyda Arslan / Ginger Riessen vs Kimberly Ricchio / Debra Brambora6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNgozi Ezike / Kelly O'Donnell vs Sharon Martinez / Yuko Suzuki6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNgozi Ezike / Kelly O'Donnell vs Lara Phillips / Erin Wyatt6-1, 6-5
W#2 DoublesCeyda Arslan / Ginger Riessen vs Lora Varnelis / Jennifer Nemec6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCeyda Arslan / Ginger Riessen vs Julie Sujack / Katherine Martin6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesChristi Cashman / Carlene Motto vs Allison Goldberg / Dawn Baumann7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNgozi Ezike / Kelly O'Donnell vs Erica Eisner / Julie Weidner7-6, 2-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Boruff / Lorraine Wong vs Elizabeth Quigley / Silvie Fankhauser6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCarlene Motto / Debbie Skowron vs Sally Washlow / Suzanne Carr2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly O'Donnell / Kristy Sweigard vs Ginger Gorden / Leslie Weinger6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKara Levin / Julie Boruff vs Amy Goss / Gail Wilson3-6, 5-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKelly O'Donnell / Ceyda Arslan vs Karen Materick / Colleen Stover6-2, 5-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Skowron / Kara Levin vs Wendy Leto / Paula Haggerty6-4, 2-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Evangelist / Susan Tuthill vs Margaret Chung / Heidi Darley6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Tuthill / ELIZABETH JONES vs Rosa Hugener / Suzanne Rich2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLorraine Wong / Julie Boruff vs Anne Feely / Allison Biergans6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · E
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Ngozi Ezike
published 4
4.00
Ginger Riessen
published 4
3.92
Kristy Sweigard
published 4
3.78
Julie Boruff
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Cathy Evangelist
published 4
3.67
Carlene Motto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Katerina Hickey
published 4
3.65
Debbie Skowron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Laura Skuja
published
3.62
Christi Cashman
published 4
3.62
Denise Huth
published 4
3.60
Lorraine Wong
published
3.56
Ceyda Arslan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Janice Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
ELIZABETH JONES
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Lisa Ventrella
published 3.5
Jennifer Lenahan
published
Kara Levin
published
Kelly O'Donnell
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Stacy Fox
published
Susan Tuthill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Skowron + Katerina Hickey4258% games+13.7% vs expected
Julie Boruff + Lorraine Wong261356% games+6.2% vs expected
Kristy Sweigard + Katerina Hickey10163% games+4.8% vs expected
Susan Tuthill + Cathy Evangelist121253% games+4.3% vs expected
Ceyda Arslan + Kelly O'Donnell6158% games+3.8% vs expected
Ngozi Ezike + Kelly O'Donnell25263% games+2.9% vs expected
Kristy Sweigard + Ginger Riessen5358% games+2.9% vs expected
Ceyda Arslan + Ginger Riessen8266% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ngozi Ezike
301W–168L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Ginger Riessen
244W–127L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Kristy Sweigard
224W–142L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
Julie Boruff
123W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Cathy Evangelist
108W–96L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Carlene Motto
131W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Katerina Hickey
87W–101L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Debbie Skowron
64W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Laura Skuja
95W–58L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Christi Cashman
71W–71L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Denise Huth
87W–48L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Lorraine Wong
83W–41L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Ceyda Arslan
64W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Janice Scott
50W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
ELIZABETH JONES
19W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Lisa Ventrella
58W–72L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Lenahan
26W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kara Levin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly O'Donnell
71W–38L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Fox
34W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Tuthill
24W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.