Teams

CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Forest View Hayashida Sat 4 $21

CDTA ESL 40 & Over W · E

22 players · average NTRP 3.90 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesHyun Young Han / Kathy Loria vs Laura Purcell / Alja Hessami-Maas2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAgnieszka Filipek vs Colleen Stover6-7, 0-2
L#2 DoublesPatricia Behnke / Hyun Young Han vs Paula Haggerty / Margaret Chung2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Rosencrans / Joni Roseri vs Angela Lukas / Tracie Wilcox7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAgnieszka Filipek vs Alison Donnelly3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerra Jahns / Jan MacK vs Lisa Hans / Gayle Dominicis4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Petrova vs Jennifer Lenahan3-6, 5-4
L#2 DoublesLara Phillips / Erin Wyatt vs Ngozi Ezike / Kelly O'Donnell1-6, 5-6
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Petrova vs Desiree Witte7-6, 3-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYumi Ida / Jennifer Ligammari vs Pam Fisher / Lynne Sakanich2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTomoko Hayashida / Terra Jahns vs AnneMarie Geary / Christina Greeley3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Loria / Joni Roseri vs Elizabeth Quigley / Stephanie Thompson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W MT Bann Meng Sat 2 $258231925285
2CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W S Barrington Gray Sat 9 $2082271330297
3CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Tam Corey Sun 11 $2082261430289
4CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Forest View Hayashida Sat 4 $2164202045336
5CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Oak Brook Lukas Sun 5 $2064182250371
6CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Hinsdale Cashman Sun 5 $2055211945342
7CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W TF Oak Park Sullivan Sat 3 $2046211943335
8CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W S Barrington Martinez Sat 1 $2036142246317
9CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Tam Lund Sun 1 $2037142658368
10CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W River Trails Jasinski Sun 6 $2027132350343
11CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Heritage Hugener Sun 12 $2119112961407

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Terri Whiting
published 4.5
3.89
Terra Jahns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Svetlana Petrova
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.80
Cindy MacDonald
published 4
3.78
Yumi Ida
published 4
3.77
Lara Phillips
published 4
Agnieszka Filipek
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Erin Wyatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Patricia Behnke
published 4
3.69
Jennifer Ligammari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Kaori Kobayashi
published
3.59
Linda Borst
published 4
3.58
Mya Murata
published 4
3.47
Zagorka James
published 4
3.29
Deborah Sonoda
published 3.5
3.28
Kathy Loria
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Beth Rosencrans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Mishez Avari
published 3.5
3.04
Tomoko Hayashida
published 3.5
Hyun Young Han
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jan MacK
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joni Roseri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Whiting + Linda Borst281357% games+8.8% vs expected
Yumi Ida + Patricia Behnke9359% games+6.6% vs expected
Mya Murata + Lara Phillips4262% games+2.1% vs expected
Mya Murata + Patricia Behnke6257% games+1.6% vs expected
Agnieszka Filipek + Yumi Ida6254% games−0.0% vs expected
Lara Phillips + Erin Wyatt121352% games−0.1% vs expected
Jan MacK + Patricia Behnke14552% games−0.8% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Terra Jahns15460% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Terri Whiting
165W–55L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Terra Jahns
131W–84L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Svetlana Petrova
124W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Cindy MacDonald
74W–52L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Yumi Ida
185W–161L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Lara Phillips
98W–91L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Agnieszka Filipek
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Erin Wyatt
20W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Patricia Behnke
103W–89L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Jennifer Ligammari
64W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Kaori Kobayashi
21W–45L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Linda Borst
78W–75L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
4
Mya Murata
95W–100L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Zagorka James
290W–179L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Deborah Sonoda
22W–30L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Kathy Loria
43W–127L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Beth Rosencrans
23W–28L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Mishez Avari
53W–87L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Tomoko Hayashida
126W–186L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Hyun Young Han
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jan MacK
47W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Joni Roseri
20W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.