Teams

OSRC:18+ Men Jones:Jones/Trausch

2026 ECT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.5 Men 1

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-07vs OSRC:18 & 4.5:FratoniWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoseph Trausch / Stewart Hudson vs Michael Diorio / James McGee3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesStefan Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Fullam / Alexander Cornelius vs Scott Dunn / Frederick France6-1, 6-2
2026-01-17vs GF:Stiff Competition:MarraLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoseph Trausch / Davon Chen vs Joe Mercuri / Matthew Murphy3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlexander Cornelius vs Adam Gerber2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Wood / Lad Ricker vs Chris Gaudreau / Christopher Sankey4-6, 4-6
2026-01-10vs OSRC:18 & 4.5:FratoniLost 13
W#1 DoublesJoseph Trausch / Dylan Avena vs Michael Diorio / James McGee2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStefan Jones vs Noah Gulla6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavon Chen / Stewart Hudson vs Nicholas Bosco / Steven Gulla3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJon Alvarez / Lad Ricker vs Aaron Casey / David Chen6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-12-13vs GF:Stiff Competition:MarraLost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrew Raucci / Stewart Hudson vs Joe Mercuri / Glenn Ufland7-5, 1-4
W#1 SinglesStefan Jones vs Matthew Murphy6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Li / Alexander Cornelius vs Ted Cohen / Christopher Sankey2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLad Ricker / Marc Kitz vs Joni Lieponis / Adam Gerber3-6, 3-6
2025-11-15vs OSRC:18 & 4.5:FratoniWon 21
W#1 DoublesStefan Jones / Dylan Avena vs Aaron Casey / David Chen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrew Raucci / Joseph Trausch vs Michael Diorio / Wayne Jang4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichael Fullam / David Li vs Scott Dunn / Ben Citrin6-4, 6-2
2025-11-08vs GF:Stiff Competition:MarraLost 04
L#1 DoublesAlexander Cornelius / Michael Fullam vs Elijah Hanlon / Adam Gerber2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStefan Jones vs Matthew Murphy6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavon Chen / David Li vs Christopher Marra / Joe Mercuri6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarc Kitz / David Peterson vs Charles Woodward / Lutz Braum2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OSRC:18 & 4.5:Fratoni0571329196
2OSRC:18+ Men Jones:Jones/Trausch0551531194
3GF:Stiff Competition:Marra0620414164

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Stefan Jones
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.36
Dylan Avena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Michael Fullam
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Raucci
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Stewart Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Alexander Cornelius
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.00
Joseph Trausch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Davon Chen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.92
John Gannon
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Marc Kitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Li
published 4
David Peterson
published 4
3.69
Matthew Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Jon Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.52
Lad Ricker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dylan Avena + Stefan Jones15171% games+6.8% vs expected
Andrew Raucci + Stewart Hudson3255% games+2.8% vs expected
Joseph Trausch + Andrew Raucci2349% games−6.4% vs expected
Jon Alvarez + Lad Ricker1536% games−14.4% vs expected
Marc Kitz + Lad Ricker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stefan Jones
80W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
4.43
4.5
Dylan Avena
45W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
Michael Fullam
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Andrew Raucci
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stewart Hudson
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Alexander Cornelius
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Joseph Trausch
12W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.00
4
Davon Chen
6W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
John Gannon
71W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Marc Kitz
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
David Li
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
David Peterson
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Wood
45W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Jon Alvarez
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Lad Ricker
6W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.