Teams

GF:Stiff Competition:Marra

2026 ECT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.5 Men 1

13 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-31vs OSRC:18 & 4.5:FratoniWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Murphy / Ted Cohen vs Wayne Jang / James McGee6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMauricio Miranda vs Steven Gulla6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristopher Marra / Chris Gaudreau vs Nicholas Bosco / Michael Diorio0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLutz Braum / Charles Woodward vs Aaron Casey / Scott Dunn6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-17vs OSRC:18+ Men Jones:Jones/TrauschWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoe Mercuri / Matthew Murphy vs Joseph Trausch / Davon Chen6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAdam Gerber vs Alexander Cornelius6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Gaudreau / Christopher Sankey vs Matthew Wood / Lad Ricker6-4, 6-4
2025-12-13vs OSRC:18+ Men Jones:Jones/TrauschWon 31
W#1 DoublesJoe Mercuri / Glenn Ufland vs Andrew Raucci / Stewart Hudson5-7, 4-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Murphy vs Stefan Jones1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTed Cohen / Christopher Sankey vs David Li / Alexander Cornelius6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoni Lieponis / Adam Gerber vs Lad Ricker / Marc Kitz6-3, 6-3
2025-12-06vs OSRC:18 & 4.5:FratoniWon 31
W#1 DoublesJoe Mercuri / Matthew Murphy vs Steven Gulla / Noah Gulla7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMauricio Miranda vs Nicholas Bosco6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTed Cohen / Elijah Hanlon vs Michael Diorio / James McGee6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLutz Braum / Joni Lieponis vs Frederick France / Aaron Casey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-08vs OSRC:18+ Men Jones:Jones/TrauschWon 40
W#1 DoublesElijah Hanlon / Adam Gerber vs Alexander Cornelius / Michael Fullam6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMatthew Murphy vs Stefan Jones1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Marra / Joe Mercuri vs Davon Chen / David Li3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Woodward / Lutz Braum vs Marc Kitz / David Peterson6-2, 6-4
2025-10-11vs OSRC:18 & 4.5:FratoniWon 21
W#1 DoublesTed Cohen / Joe Mercuri vs Aaron Casey / Scott Dunn6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMatthew Murphy vs James McGee2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElijah Hanlon / Mauricio Miranda vs Michael Diorio / Robert Noack6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OSRC:18 & 4.5:Fratoni0571329196
2OSRC:18+ Men Jones:Jones/Trausch0551531194
3GF:Stiff Competition:Marra0620414164

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Mauricio Miranda
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.35
Adam Gerber
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
Elijah Hanlon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
Joe Mercuri
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.26
Ted Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
Christopher Sankey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Matthew Murphy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.97
Joni Lieponis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Lutz Braum
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.86
Chris Gaudreau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Charles Woodward
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.74
Christopher Marra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Glenn Ufland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lutz Braum + Charles Woodward3251% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Murphy + Christopher Marra314 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Murphy + Joe Mercuri303 matchesnot enough data
Ted Cohen + Joe Mercuri303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mauricio Miranda
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Adam Gerber
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
Elijah Hanlon
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
4.34
Joe Mercuri
17W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.30
Ted Cohen
30W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Christopher Sankey
6W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
Matthew Murphy
76W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.13
Joni Lieponis
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.97
Lutz Braum
15W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.88
4.5
Chris Gaudreau
2W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.86
4
Charles Woodward
63W–61L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4.5
Christopher Marra
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.74
Glenn Ufland
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.