Teams

Green 2: Beatt/LF

2023 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 2.5 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-29vs Goldie Thompson/LFWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristine Taylor / Elaina Osteen vs LaQuisha Epps / Georgette Morris2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Schaffitzel vs Tamika Paredes6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Bennett / Chelsea Penn vs Stephanie Jackson / Tia Hill6-0, 7-6
2023-06-28vs Southerland/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesElaina Osteen / Lindsay Bennett vs Jen Taylor / Jamie Huth6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Schaffitzel vs Beth Peters6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristine Taylor / Melissa Bean vs Carissa Pankey / Holly Raley6-1, 6-1
2023-06-12vs Kirkpatrick/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristine Taylor / Elaina Osteen vs Kristen Maronek / Jamie Calkins6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLauren Schaffitzel vs Nicole Swiggett6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Bennett / Chelsea Penn vs Lindsey Kirkpatrick / Missy Torgerson7-6, 7-6
2023-06-08vs Long/CRWon 21
L#1 DoublesElaina Osteen / Kristine Taylor vs Jenifer Gravley / Amy Greenhaw6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Schaffitzel vs Barbara Ford6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Bennett / Ellen Devereux vs Stephanie Long / Brandy Roulet6-3, 6-2
2023-05-31vs Green 1: Wyatt/SHWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristine Taylor / Melissa Bean vs Maggie Yar / Karena Miller6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLauren Schaffitzel vs Hilliary Lenhart6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKellie Grayson / Kim Lauer vs Whitney Bingham / Sarah Garrow3-6, 0-6
2023-05-23vs Gulledge/ISWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay Bennett / Elaina Osteen vs Jennifer Mason / Tammy Mattox7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLauren Schaffitzel vs Lindsey Poole6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKim Lauer / Hannah Harrelson vs Nancy Park / Donna Kraybill2-6, 2-6
2023-05-17vs Hill/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsay Bennett / Kristine Taylor vs Kaylynn Elmore / Julie Redington4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Schaffitzel vs Lisa Kramer6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKim Lauer / Ellen Devereux vs Courtney Pearce / Laura Gavula3-6, 3-6
2023-05-10vs West/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristine Taylor / Elaina Osteen vs Vanessa Negley / Holly Bevill6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLauren Schaffitzel vs Sandie Barns6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Bean / Hannah Harrelson vs Olivia Bliss / Miranda Grimes3-6, 4-6
2023-04-27vs Laura Watson/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesElaina Osteen / Lindsay Bennett vs Lindsey Helmerich / Margaret Reimann6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKim Lauer vs Skylar Jackson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristine Taylor / Lauren Schaffitzel vs Rashell Ruefly / Julie Peters6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKWC/Quick/18&over2.5W902439145
2Green 1: Wyatt/SH8123413172
3Green 2: Beatt/LF8120717192
4Orange 2: Howard/CR7221616177
5Long/CR63161126224
6Knight/LF63141329231
7Hill/LF5418920182
8Barnes/IS45111633230
9Hunt/LF45131434257
10Danielle Watson/LF36111636251
11Goldie Thompson/LF3691837265
12Amber Hendrix/LF3662144278
13Oquin-Wall/LF27101736244
14West/LF2772042282
15Laura Watson/LF2772044286
16Southerland/LF0932448294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Lauren Schaffitzel
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
2.44
Kim Lauer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Chelsea Penn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Hannah Harrelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Kristine Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.12
Elaina Osteen
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Ellen Devereux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kellie Grayson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Bean
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Bean + Kristine Taylor4155% games+15.1% vs expected
Elaina Osteen + Chelsea Penn6354% games+7.8% vs expected
Elaina Osteen + Kristine Taylor3940% games−9.2% vs expected
Elaina Osteen + Melissa Bean224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Bean + Chelsea Penn134 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Taylor + Chelsea Penn134 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Taylor + Kim Lauer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Schaffitzel
19W–13L career · 9 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Kim Lauer
59W–92L career · 9 lines in 2023
0%69%31%
2.44
2.5
Chelsea Penn
18W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Hannah Harrelson
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristine Taylor
53W–77L career · 12 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Elaina Osteen
32W–48L career · 12 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Ellen Devereux
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kellie Grayson
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Bean
14W–19L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.