Teams

Southerland/LF

2023 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 2.5 WOMEN

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-28vs Green 2: Beatt/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesJen Taylor / Jamie Huth vs Elaina Osteen / Lindsay Bennett4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBeth Peters vs Lauren Schaffitzel0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarissa Pankey / Holly Raley vs Kristine Taylor / Melissa Bean1-6, 1-6
2023-06-27vs Green 1: Wyatt/SHLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Huth / Leslie Southerland vs Carrie Zenthoefer / Mckinsey Cavuoti4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJen Taylor vs Bailey Bird6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEsther Bruce / Holly Raley vs Whitney Bingham / Sarah Garrow2-6, 3-6
2023-06-14vs Hill/LFLost 02
L#1 DoublesJamie Huth / Michelle Salyer vs Laura Gavula / Stephanie Heckenkemper5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesChere Fergerson vs Christy Stewart3-6, 0-6
2023-06-06vs West/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesJamie Huth / Jen Taylor vs Olivia Bliss / Hannah Payne6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLeslie Southerland vs Miranda Grimes6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChere Fergerson / Holly Raley vs Emily Hale / Rebecca Gillego5-7, 2-6
2023-06-01vs Long/CRLost 03
L#1 DoublesEsther Bruce / Leslie Southerland vs Barbara Ford / Leah Maples0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJamie Huth vs Lindsey Sprague3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChere Fergerson / Christy Reece vs Amy Greenhaw / Ashlee Lowry3-6, 5-7
2023-05-31vs Laura Watson/LFLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Peters / Chere Fergerson vs Krystal ONan / Kristian Kelly4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-23vs Goldie Thompson/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesJamie Huth / Jen Taylor vs Tia Hill / Georgette Morris7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichelle Salyer vs LaQuisha Epps2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Raley / Carissa Pankey vs Stephanie McCaskill / Stephanie Jackson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-16vs Gulledge/ISLost 03
L#1 DoublesJen Taylor / Beth Peters vs Nancy Park / Michelle Spillars3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesChristy Reece vs Gayle Seaton1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Salyer / Leslie Southerland vs Lori Smith / Kathryn Jessogne6-7, 1-6
2023-05-10vs Kirkpatrick/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Huth / Beth Peters vs Jennifer Hamilton / Kristen Maronek2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Salyer vs Jamie Calkins6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJen Taylor / Chere Fergerson vs Kathryn Junk / Bonnie Presley2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKWC/Quick/18&over2.5W902439145
2Green 1: Wyatt/SH8123413172
3Green 2: Beatt/LF8120717192
4Orange 2: Howard/CR7221616177
5Long/CR63161126224
6Knight/LF63141329231
7Hill/LF5418920182
8Barnes/IS45111633230
9Hunt/LF45131434257
10Danielle Watson/LF36111636251
11Goldie Thompson/LF3691837265
12Amber Hendrix/LF3662144278
13Oquin-Wall/LF27101736244
14West/LF2772042282
15Laura Watson/LF2772044286
16Southerland/LF0932448294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Jen Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.51
Jamie Huth
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Beth Peters
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.09
Christy Reece
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.05
Michelle Salyer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.04
Chere Fergerson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.04
Leslie Southerland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.99
Holly Raley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carissa Pankey
published
Esther Bruce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jen Taylor + Jamie Huth131156% games+7.4% vs expected
Michelle Salyer + Leslie Southerland4350% games+4.2% vs expected
Chere Fergerson + Christy Reece2543% games−2.5% vs expected
Michelle Salyer + Chere Fergerson303 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Southerland + Jamie Huth033 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Southerland + Christy Reece123 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Southerland + Holly Raley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jen Taylor
23W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.59
Jamie Huth
23W–35L career · 7 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Beth Peters
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Christy Reece
18W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Michelle Salyer
14W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Chere Fergerson
7W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Leslie Southerland
17W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Holly Raley
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Carissa Pankey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Esther Bruce
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.