Teams

Team 6 Elsheikh- Belle Haven

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-16vs Team 11 Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Siegfried / Lisa Russo MacK vs Noeline Arul / Cynthia Grubbs7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-19vs Team 3 Deuces WildWon 10
W#1 DoublesKendra Doveala / Terry Siegfried vs Etomgi O / Jennifer Barr Weiss6-0, 6-0
2024-08-18vs Team 4 Springfield Summer AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Pritsios / Terry Siegfried vs Christie Palmer / Anar Pathak6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-13vs Team 2 Tri & Catch UsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTerry Siegfried / Tara Weeks vs Holly Glauser / Sara Franklin6-3, 6-2
2024-08-06vs Team 10 WGCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Terry Siegfried vs Taryn Walpole / Kerri Thomas4-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Lisa Karlisch
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.40
Stephanie Elsheikh
published
Alison Weiss
published 3.5
Gibson McMahon
published 3.5
3.22
Anna McLean
published 3.5
3.09
Suzanne Pritsios
published
2.87
Pam Murphy
published
2.79
Terry Siegfried
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Ann Ballard
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Karlisch
40W–60L career · 8 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.46
Stephanie Elsheikh
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Alison Weiss
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Gibson McMahon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Anna McLean
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Suzanne Pritsios
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.09
Pam Murphy
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Terry Siegfried
33W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Ann Ballard
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.