Teams

PW.Miller

2024 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-22vs TOC.IrishSplit 11
L#1 SinglesHeather Hastings vs Najia Cheema1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesShayna Bolton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-05vs MD.WintersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesShayna Bolton vs Allie Ligay6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMichaela Brannock vs Lindsay Winters6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-08-01vs TOC.IrishWon 20
W#1 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Stephanie Hanses6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesHeather Hastings vs Alison Rooks6-4, 7-5
2024-07-31vs MD.WintersLost 02
L#1 SinglesHeather Hastings vs Amy Rogers1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichaela Brannock vs Allie Ligay5-7, 0-6
2024-07-11vs TOC.IrishWon 10
W#1 SinglesShayna Bolton vs Stephanie Hanses6-0, 6-0
2024-06-20vs MD.WintersWon 10
W#2 SinglesMichaela Brannock vs Lindsay Winters6-4, 6-4
2024-06-13vs TOC.IrishWon 20
W#1 SinglesHeather Hastings vs Stephanie Hanses6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Meghan O'Hara6-1, 7-6
2024-05-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Amy Rogers6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Shayna Bolton
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.66
Michaela Brannock
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4
3.34
Julie Evans
published
3.27
Heather Hastings
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.22
Melinda Reinicker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Angela Newman
published 3.5
3.05
Hollis Mertens
published
Kristen Kruszewski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Reinicker + Michaela Brannock6164% gamesnot enough data
Shayna Bolton + Michaela Brannock404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shayna Bolton
106W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Michaela Brannock
88W–28L career · 8 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Julie Evans
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Heather Hastings
61W–69L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Melinda Reinicker
98W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Angela Newman
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Hollis Mertens
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Kristen Kruszewski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.