Teams

MD.Winters

2024 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-15Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrigette Flower vs Camille McDaniel6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLindsay Winters vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrigette Flower vs Camille McDaniel6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Yelizaveta Petrova - (DQ)6-0, 6-0
2024-08-05vs PW.MillerLost 12
L#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Shayna Bolton1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Michaela Brannock6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Angela Newman3-6, 0-6
2024-07-31vs PW.MillerWon 20
W#2 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Michaela Brannock7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Angela Newman6-1, 6-1
2024-06-27vs TOC.IrishWon 21
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Najia Cheema6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Camille McDaniel6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAmy Kell vs Jenna Wood6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-06-20vs PW.MillerWon 21
W#1 SinglesBrigette Flower vs Julie Evans6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Michaela Brannock4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Hollis Mertens7-6, 7-5
2024-06-10Won 20
W#2 SinglesAmy Kell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Alison Rooks6-4, 6-4
2024-05-30vs PW.MillerWon 20
W#2 SinglesCait Bauer vs Laura Miller7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Hollis Mertens7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Amy Kell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.61
Brigette Flower
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.61
Allie Ligay
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Cait Bauer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Lindsay Winters
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Meredith Kinkle
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Shari McCandlish
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Kell + Brigette Flower29466% games+3.6% vs expected
Allie Ligay + Cait Bauer314 matchesnot enough data
Allie Ligay + Lindsay Winters123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Kell
185W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Brigette Flower
177W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Allie Ligay
202W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Cait Bauer
86W–51L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Lindsay Winters
84W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Meredith Kinkle
62W–58L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Shari McCandlish
82W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.