Teams

AK - A & E

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-16vs Mystery 3.0WWon 40
W#1 DoublesFledz Lastimoso / Rena Yancha vs Penny Rohacek / Cecilia Hopper6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Duclos / Sherry Sedwick vs Nina Brudie / Barbara Jacobs7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAllison Burand vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDolores Alley / Emily Elison vs Kori Callison / Brook Connolly6-1, 6-2
2021-05-15vs Mystery 3.0WWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Duclos / Sherry Sedwick vs Kori Callison / Brook Connolly6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs Penny Rohacek6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDolores Alley / Rena Yancha vs Song Bliss / Cecilia Hopper5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAllison Burand / Fledz Lastimoso vs Nina Brudie / Barbara Jacobs6-2, 6-2
2021-05-14vs Mystery 3.0WWon 50
W#1 DoublesAllison Burand / Dolores Alley vs Song Bliss / Barbara Jacobs6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSherry Sedwick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFledz Lastimoso / Rena Yancha vs Joaquita Martin / Cecilia Hopper6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJennifer Duclos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Michelle Trowbridge vs Brook Connolly / Kori Callison6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AK - A & E30141369

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Emily Elison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
Jennifer Duclos
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Sherry Sedwick
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Allison Burand
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dolores Alley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Fledz Lastimoso
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Rena Yancha
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Duclos + Sherry Sedwick10362% games+6.5% vs expected
Allison Burand + Dolores Alley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Elison
172W–110L career · 6 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Jennifer Duclos
76W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherry Sedwick
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Allison Burand
50W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Dolores Alley
34W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Fledz Lastimoso
30W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Rena Yancha
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.