Teams

V - Las Posas Ringers

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WD VENT · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-10vs V - Sherwood Stars WDLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Gisler / Gwen Speakes vs Renee Christopher / Lisa Warren6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-11-04vs V - WACettesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeanna Sonnenberg / Julie Gisler vs Mary Feldstein / Lindsay Cowen6-4, 6-2
2022-10-26vs V - Mission Oaks Love HurtsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Spasiano / Julie Gisler vs Wendy Brown / Jen O'Keefe6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Deardorff / Ginger Kohler vs Mary Carpenter / Tammy Snyder3-6, 0-6
2022-09-22vs V - Mission Oaks Parks and WreckLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Yoshimura / Deanna Sonnenberg vs Julie Kurowski / Stella Dumlao-Idea3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Alimena / Julie Gisler vs Annie Kakuk / Katelyn Monday6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGinger Kohler / Barbara Sandrasagra vs Leilani Mayer / Juliet Brown4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Barbara Sandrasagra
published 3.5
3.29
Carrie Kelleher
published 3.5
3.25
Tera Williams
published
3.24
Jaimee Seay
published 3.5
3.20
Julie Gisler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jill Spasiano
published
3.19
Shannon Price
published
3.15
Kelly Deardorff
published
3.13
Lisa Yoshimura
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Deanna Sonnenberg
published 3.5
2.57
Ginger Kohler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lisa Weckbacher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Gisler + Kelly Deardorff4168% games+5.8% vs expected
Tera Williams + Jaimee Seay6256% games+5.1% vs expected
Ginger Kohler + Julie Gisler123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Yoshimura + Julie Gisler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Sandrasagra
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Carrie Kelleher
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Tera Williams
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jaimee Seay
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Julie Gisler
124W–126L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Jill Spasiano
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Shannon Price
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Kelly Deardorff
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Lisa Yoshimura
118W–165L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Deanna Sonnenberg
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Ginger Kohler
24W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Lisa Weckbacher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.