Teams

V - Mission Oaks Love Hurts

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WD VENT · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesJen O'Keefe / Yvette Hays vs Amy Whitney / Erin Brubach6-1, 6-2
2022-11-04vs V - Mission Oaks Parks and WreckWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Hendrickson / Kristin Pena vs Leilani Mayer / Julie Kurowski6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWendy Brown / Yvette Hays vs Elizabeth Jensen / Kristin Casanova6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-11vs V - WACettesLost 01
L#3 DoublesWendy Brown / Yvette Hays vs Lindsay Cowen / Mary Feldstein6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-04vs V - Sunset I'd Hit ThatWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Covington / Diane Hendrickson vs Susan Friedman / Bahar Sutorius7-5, 3-0
W#2 DoublesYvette Hays / Denny Zoev vs Tracy Collins / Ina Kim6-0, 6-1
2022-09-26vs V - Sunset Bad Ace BeachesLost 01
L#3 DoublesLauren Napoli / Lindsey Rodman vs Jean Bridges / Michelle Lambert2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-12vs V - Pierpont PumasSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDiane Hendrickson / Lindsey Rodman vs Lynne Krueger / Siri Rochin1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Green / Yvette Hays vs Maria Finney / Adele Beardsley6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Darcy Antonellis
published 4
3.51
Lauren Napoli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Natascha Crecion
published
3.33
Lindsey Rodman
published
Arlene Monnar
published 3.5
3.19
Myla Hanson
published
3.19
Denny Zoev
published 3.5
3.11
Wendy Brown
published
3.05
Jen O'Keefe
published
2.96
Yvette Hays
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Diane Hendrickson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsey Rodman + Lauren Napoli7655% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darcy Antonellis
17W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Lauren Napoli
144W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
Natascha Crecion
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lindsey Rodman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Arlene Monnar
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Myla Hanson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Denny Zoev
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Wendy Brown
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jen O'Keefe
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Yvette Hays
61W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Diane Hendrickson
90W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.