Teams

V - Sunset I'd Hit That

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WD VENT · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-15vs V - Sunset Bad Ace BeachesLost 01
L#2 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Deborah Kerr-Orlik vs Jean Bridges / Michelle Lambert3-6, 3-6
2022-10-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDeborah Kerr-Orlik / Raymi Schwartz vs Norrene Dibenedetto / Appolina Osborne3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSusan Friedman / Deborah Kerr-Orlik vs Liat Ciardi / Mary Carpenter3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Cierra Smalling vs Wendy Dormer / Deborah Snyder1-6, 3-6
2022-10-21vs V - Mission Oaks Parks and WreckWon 10
W#2 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Deborah Kerr-Orlik vs Julie Kurowski / Denise Bolish0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-10-14vs V - Las Posas RingersLost 01
L#2 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Cierra Smalling vs Kelly Deardorff / Shannon Price6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-06vs V - Sherwood Stars WDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeborah Kerr-Orlik / Bahar Sutorius vs Renee Christopher / Deva May0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Friedman / Raymi Schwartz vs Athene Durrant / Lisa Furfine1-6, 1-6
2022-10-04vs V - Mission Oaks Love HurtsLost 01
L#3 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Cierra Smalling vs Jill Green / Natascha Crecion5-7, 1-6
2022-09-30vs V - WACettesWon 10
W#3 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Cierra Smalling vs Robyn Russak / Renae Saliano6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Ina Kim
published 3.5
3.39
Janice Pinnell
published
3.00
Susan Friedman
published
2.99
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.98
Raymi Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.23
PAMELA COLBERT
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Kerr-Orlik + Raymi Schwartz2349% gamesnot enough data
Janice Pinnell + Ina Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Janice Pinnell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
57W–134L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3.5
Raymi Schwartz
111W–147L career · type A · 10 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
PAMELA COLBERT
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.