Teams

Swingers

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-09-19vs Single MindedWon 21
L#1 SinglesDiana Talesnick vs Claudia Holanda3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Liz Price6-2, 6-5
W#3 SinglesAlison Serino vs Tamar Henkin6-1, 6-1
2024-08-27vs Single MindedWon 20
W#2 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Tamar Henkin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnto Faini vs Jennie Kim6-1, 6-1
2024-08-19vs New HomiesLost 01
L#3 SinglesAlison Serino vs Penelope Bell4-6, 1-6
2024-08-12vs Juan 3.5Won 10
W#3 SinglesDiana Talesnick vs Barbara Braffett6-0, 6-0
2024-07-31vs New HomiesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAlison Serino vs Yulan Jin2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDiana Talesnick vs Penelope Bell6-3, 7-5
2024-07-28vs Juan 3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesAlison Serino vs Prashila Dullabh6-3, 6-1
2024-07-22vs New HomiesLost 01
L#3 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Millette Miller7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2024-07-18vs Juan 3.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesAlison Serino vs Chao Wang2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDiana Talesnick vs Meghan Smith6-3, 7-5
2024-07-15vs Single MindedSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAnto Faini vs Jennie Kim6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesDiana Talesnick vs Suzanne Krudys1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-13Won 10
W#2 SinglesAnto Faini vs Jilan Chen6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Diana Talesnick
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.67
Sherra Dung
published
3.66
Anto Faini
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.63
Mel Barrett
published
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Alison Serino
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.49
Lauren Chilton
published
3.42
Sheila O'Connell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Thongphok + Anto Faini131152% games−1.5% vs expected
Sheila O'Connell + Anto Faini303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Talesnick
90W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Sherra Dung
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Anto Faini
226W–104L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.66
Mel Barrett
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
276W–124L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Alison Serino
162W–124L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Lauren Chilton
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
Sheila O'Connell
23W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.