Teams

GJTC JHARAWI

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

10 players · average NTRP 3.14 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-13vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 31
W#1 DoublesDan Terrell / Julio Holcomb vs Andrew W Smith / Omar Bou-Matar6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMatthew Charts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDan Oliver vs Seth Ritchey3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNathaniel Higginson / Doug Larson vs Kriss Burwell / Kirsh Duncombe6-1, 6-4
2025-05-05vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 31
W#1 DoublesJoseph Harawi / Brantley Bond vs Andrew W Smith / Brian Birch7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulio Holcomb vs Seth Ritchey6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLee Smith / Bryan Martin vs Kriss Burwell / Stan Scott4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNathaniel Higginson vs Todd Rowell6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2025-04-29vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 50
W#1 DoublesMatthew Charts / Dan Oliver vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBrantley Bond vs Kirsh Duncombe6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLee Smith / Dan Terrell vs Kriss Burwell / Andrew W Smith6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJoseph Harawi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNathaniel Higginson / Doug Larson vs Brian Birch / Sam Kearl6-2, 6-4
2025-04-22vs GJTC OBOU-MATARLost 14
L#1 DoublesDan Oliver / Dan Terrell vs Omar Bou-Matar / Andrew W Smith1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Charts vs Seth Ritchey6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Rhoads / Doug Larson vs Todd Rowell / Brian Birch3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJoseph Harawi vs Sam Kearl6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLee Smith / Bryan Martin vs Kirsh Duncombe / Kriss Burwell5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-15vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 41
W#1 DoublesMatthew Charts / Lee Smith vs Omar Bou-Matar / Stan Scott7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJulio Holcomb vs Todd Rowell7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Martin / Nathaniel Higginson vs Seth Ritchey / Kriss Burwell3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesBrantley Bond vs Andrew W Smith6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoseph Harawi / Steve Watson vs Matthew Garcia / Scott Collister6-2, 6-2
2025-04-08vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 41
W#1 DoublesJulio Holcomb / John Rhoads vs Brian Birch / Todd Rowell6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJoseph Harawi vs Omar Bou-Matar7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDan Oliver / Brantley Bond vs Stan Scott / Sam Kearl2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNathaniel Higginson vs Matthew Garcia6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDoug Larson / Steve Watson vs Kirsh Duncombe / Seth Ritchey3-6, 3-6
2025-04-05vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 50
W#1 DoublesJoseph Harawi / Dan Terrell vs Brian Birch / Matthew Garcia6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJulio Holcomb vs Omar Bou-Matar6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDoug Larson / Matthew Charts vs Seth Ritchey / Andrew W Smith6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDan Oliver vs Kirsh Duncombe6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrantley Bond / Bryan Martin vs Kriss Burwell / Scott Collister6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Julio Holcomb
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Joseph Harawi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Matthew Charts
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.78
Nathaniel Higginson
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Brantley Bond
usually #2 Singles 20%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Dan Oliver
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Dan Terrell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Doug Larson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
John Rhoads
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lee Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Oliver + Dan Terrell123 matchesnot enough data
Dan Terrell + Doug Larson033 matchesnot enough data
Dan Terrell + Julio Holcomb303 matchesnot enough data
Doug Larson + Matthew Charts303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julio Holcomb
42W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Joseph Harawi
46W–49L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Matthew Charts
63W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Nathaniel Higginson
19W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Brantley Bond
5W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dan Oliver
25W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dan Terrell
18W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Doug Larson
38W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
John Rhoads
7W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lee Smith
6W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.