Teams

GJTC OBOU-MATAR

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-13vs GJTC JHARAWILost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrew W Smith / Omar Bou-Matar vs Dan Terrell / Julio Holcomb3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Birch / Stan Scott vs Bryan Martin / Steve Watson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSeth Ritchey vs Dan Oliver6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKriss Burwell / Kirsh Duncombe vs Nathaniel Higginson / Doug Larson1-6, 4-6
2025-05-05vs GJTC JHARAWILost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrew W Smith / Brian Birch vs Joseph Harawi / Brantley Bond6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSeth Ritchey vs Julio Holcomb2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKriss Burwell / Stan Scott vs Lee Smith / Bryan Martin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTodd Rowell vs Nathaniel Higginson1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-04-29vs GJTC JHARAWILost 03
L#1 SinglesKirsh Duncombe vs Brantley Bond1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKriss Burwell / Andrew W Smith vs Lee Smith / Dan Terrell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Birch / Sam Kearl vs Nathaniel Higginson / Doug Larson2-6, 4-6
2025-04-22vs GJTC JHARAWIWon 41
W#1 DoublesOmar Bou-Matar / Andrew W Smith vs Dan Oliver / Dan Terrell6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSeth Ritchey vs Matthew Charts4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTodd Rowell / Brian Birch vs John Rhoads / Doug Larson6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesSam Kearl vs Joseph Harawi1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKirsh Duncombe / Kriss Burwell vs Lee Smith / Bryan Martin7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-15vs GJTC JHARAWILost 14
L#1 DoublesOmar Bou-Matar / Stan Scott vs Matthew Charts / Lee Smith5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesTodd Rowell vs Julio Holcomb5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSeth Ritchey / Kriss Burwell vs Bryan Martin / Nathaniel Higginson6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAndrew W Smith vs Brantley Bond1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Garcia / Scott Collister vs Joseph Harawi / Steve Watson2-6, 2-6
2025-04-08vs GJTC JHARAWILost 14
L#1 DoublesBrian Birch / Todd Rowell vs Julio Holcomb / John Rhoads3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesOmar Bou-Matar vs Joseph Harawi6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStan Scott / Sam Kearl vs Dan Oliver / Brantley Bond6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMatthew Garcia vs Nathaniel Higginson3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKirsh Duncombe / Seth Ritchey vs Doug Larson / Steve Watson6-3, 6-3
2025-04-05vs GJTC JHARAWILost 05
L#1 DoublesBrian Birch / Matthew Garcia vs Joseph Harawi / Dan Terrell4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesOmar Bou-Matar vs Julio Holcomb1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSeth Ritchey / Andrew W Smith vs Doug Larson / Matthew Charts3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKirsh Duncombe vs Dan Oliver1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKriss Burwell / Scott Collister vs Brantley Bond / Bryan Martin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Seth Ritchey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Stan Scott
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Omar Bou-Matar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.82
Todd Rowell
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Andrew W Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Matthew Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.55
Brian Birch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Kriss Burwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.31
Scott Collister
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kirsh Duncombe
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Sam Kearl
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kriss Burwell + Seth Ritchey2443% gamesnot enough data
Scott Collister + Kriss Burwell044 matchesnot enough data
Todd Rowell + Brian Birch224 matchesnot enough data
Omar Bou-Matar + Andrew W Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Omar Bou-Matar + Kriss Burwell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Seth Ritchey
40W–85L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Stan Scott
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Omar Bou-Matar
61W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Todd Rowell
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Andrew W Smith
12W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Matthew Garcia
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.80
3
Brian Birch
6W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Kriss Burwell
23W–106L career · 6 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
Scott Collister
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.31
Kirsh Duncombe
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Kearl
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.