Teams

CV-Mission Hills/LePage & Susskind

2021 SCTA Doubles - CV · CV Women's 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#3 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Molly Woods vs Yee Lee / Lesley Gagnon6-1, 7-5
2021-10-31vs CV-Shadow Mountain/S DentonLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Henthorn / Linda Moskowitz vs Lori Gill / Stephania Denton1-6, 4-6
2021-10-24vs CV-Andalusia CC/KilburnWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeorgette LePage / Linda Moskowitz vs Judith Feinerman / Catherine Keating6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Denise Roethenmund
published 3.5
3.30
Maria Himelman
published
3.03
Cheryle Daley
published 3.5
2.99
Linda Moskowitz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Kelly Walecki
published
2.70
Ellen Boyer
published 3
Joyce Westerdahl
published
Julie Henthorn
published
Rebecca Jasmine
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Maria Himelman
14W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cheryle Daley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
Linda Moskowitz
39W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.99
Kelly Walecki
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Ellen Boyer
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Joyce Westerdahl
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Henthorn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Jasmine
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.