Teams

VC PINK

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-04vs GCC PINKLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Weaver / Elizabeth Likovich vs Katie Terwilliger / Kelly Wilson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-28vs PTC SILVERWon 10
W#2 DoublesShannon Kasperbauer / Elizabeth Likovich vs Rachel Lyons / Evelyn Snyder6-1, 6-0
2024-08-25vs WP-O ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesShannon Kasperbauer / Dana Schoonover vs Meghan Rooney / Pam Silverberg6-1, 6-1
2024-08-07vs CHCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Chichester / Dana Schoonover vs Jen de Loizaga / Laura Koelbel3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Likovich / Joanie Mankus vs Sarah Teeters / Monica Zakovich6-2, 6-1
2024-07-31vs WP-G YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Elizabeth Likovich vs Johanna Bentson / Erin Schlosser4-6, 1-6
2024-07-24vs GAC PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesDana Schoonover / Shannon Kasperbauer vs Kris Stern / Susan Kleimann6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Elizabeth Likovich vs Allison Keefer / Anna Calicchio6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Shannon Kasperbauer
published 3.5
2.83
Molly Weaver
published
2.78
Dana Schoonover
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Elizabeth Likovich
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.36
2.28
Nancy Fridstein
published
2.18
Kathleen Nisbet
published
2.15
Meridith Burrows
published
Joanie Mankus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Chichester + Nancy Fridstein134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Schoonover + Molly Weaver134 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Joanie Mankus033 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Nancy Fridstein033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Likovich + Nancy Fridstein303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shannon Kasperbauer
30W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Molly Weaver
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Dana Schoonover
27W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Elizabeth Likovich
27W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Stephanie Chichester
11W–23L career · no lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36
Nancy Fridstein
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
Kathleen Nisbet
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18
Meridith Burrows
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.15
Joanie Mankus
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.