Teams

Haynie/18/5.5/CM/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 5.5 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs McCotter-Price/18/5.5/CM/STCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJared Mourad / Drew Verner vs Corey Oliphint / Patrick Gooszen4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeffery Hebert / Marshall Haynie vs Kevin McCotter / Daniel Kosh6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJack Adams / Bobby Horne vs Clay Simonton / Randy Davidson6-3, 7-5
2026-08-17vs Wood/18/5.5/CM/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Chandler / Brandon Gautreau vs Steven Bush / Kyle Davis7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarshall Haynie / Paul Cavell vs Jake Wood / Erik Luttkus5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJason McElveen / Kevin Flood vs Andrew Dinsmore / Chad Boudreau6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Matt Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Paul Cavell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jason McElveen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Drew Verner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Jack Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Jared Mourad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Jeffery Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Marshall Haynie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Kevin Flood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Brandon Gautreau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffery Hebert + Marshall Haynie4258% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Chandler
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Paul Cavell
30W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jason McElveen
14W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Drew Verner
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Jack Adams
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jared Mourad
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Jeffery Hebert
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
26%73%<1%
2.59
Marshall Haynie
21W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%46%54%
2.51
Kevin Flood
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Brandon Gautreau
4W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.