Teams

McCotter-Price/18/5.5/CM/STCC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 5.5 Shrev

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-26vs Bennett/18/5.5/CM/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Moore / Clay Simonton vs Michael Bennett / Matthew Walsh6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLuis DeAlba / William Madole vs Ronald Lawrence / Timothy Walsh2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Kosh / Cliff Leblanc vs Hal Henry / Kelvin Davidson2-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs Haynie/18/5.5/CM/POTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesCorey Oliphint / Patrick Gooszen vs Jared Mourad / Drew Verner6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKevin McCotter / Daniel Kosh vs Jeffery Hebert / Marshall Haynie4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesClay Simonton / Randy Davidson vs Jack Adams / Bobby Horne3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Patrick Gooszen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Corey Oliphint
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Eric Lang
published
2.64
Kevin Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Stacy Hooper
published
2.56
Luis DeAlba
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Clay Simonton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.40
Cliff Leblanc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Gary Pennywell
published
2.30
Kevin McCotter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Randy Davidson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Kosh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jeff Pou
published
William Madole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clay Simonton + Kevin Moore1442% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Gooszen + Kevin Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Gooszen + Kevin McCotter213 matchesnot enough data
Luis DeAlba + Kevin Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Gooszen
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Corey Oliphint
9W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Eric Lang
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.87
Kevin Moore
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Stacy Hooper
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
Luis DeAlba
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Clay Simonton
9W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
3
Cliff Leblanc
2W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
Gary Pennywell
2W–12L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
Kevin McCotter
7W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.30
Randy Davidson
1W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%0%
2.27
2.5
Daniel Kosh
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeff Pou
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Madole
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.