Teams

CCC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs KC-CC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Agee / Kelly Henrichs vs Sandra Copenhaver / Lara Howe1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJordan Arnell vs Nathalia Urbano7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Morin / Tonya Rasmussen vs Christine Jacquet / Lauren Hamill6-2, 6-4
2023-05-24vs BM BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJuli Furtek / Jennifer Wright vs Elizabeth Riggs / Lisa Matter6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLiz Miller vs Leah Putnam6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJordan Arnell / Kelly Henrichs vs Dina Burgess / Sarah Chapman6-3, 6-2
2023-05-23vs GR ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesTonya Rasmussen / Jordan Arnell vs Jessica Groskopf / Andrea Godber6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wright / Liz Miller vs Ally MacDougall / Erin Feltes6-0, 6-3
2023-05-17vs KC-RH TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesJordan Arnell / Jennifer Asbury vs Kara Kelley / Rachel Hofstetter6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJuli Furtek vs Nancy Meehan6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTonya Rasmussen / Kelly Henrichs vs Kristin Potts / Susan Torgerson6-0, 6-1
2023-05-03vs LEBTC SILVERWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Morin / Kelly Henrichs vs Suzanne Termaat / LuAnn Wadman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJordan Arnell vs Lori Ashberg5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJuli Furtek / Jennifer Wright vs Cindy Louder / Kathy Stommel6-4, 6-3
2023-04-26vs BCST REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJordan Arnell / Liz Miller vs Kimberley Hoefen / Patty Archuleta4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTonya Rasmussen vs Colleen Callahan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Asbury / Kelly Henrichs vs Cris Bowman-Harvey / Liz Crowell6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-19vs HRCA-N GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesLiz Miller / Kelly Henrichs vs Andrea Caldwell / Alyssa Jenson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Agee / Laura Morin vs Carolyn Bettner / Karen Fukuoka7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings56 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BCC GOLD7026925248
2SS-LT MAROON61251022249
3LEBTC PINK61251026251
4ATC GREEN61231232298
5GTC YELLOW61221334296
6KNO GOLD51201022244
7MEA GOLD52241124264
8CVTA BLACK52251029271
9LTFC ORANGE52221332307
10WP PINK52211432264
11EM YELLOW52231232295
12CVTA NAVY52211434323
13BRMST YELLOW52201535294
14KC-RH PINK52191637301
15SS-LT TEAL52171838297
16PRKR RED52181739324
17HV SILVER52201539323
18KC-CC ORANGE43211431245
19PCC SILVER43231231253
20BTA-C ORANGE43201532285
21KC-CC NAVY43201535303
22CVTA GOLD43191636305
23SKY GREY43211436295
24APR-U BLUE43171839312
25TTA-E PINK43181740314
26CHCC RED43161943345
27KC-RH GOLD34181736294
28GAC PURPLE34191637297
29BRMST SILVER34171838306
30HFII ORANGE34181738305
31CR-DC GREEN34161940311
32RCC RED34161941311
33MC NAVY34161941302
34VC TEAL34171841310
35PCC GOLD34161942313
36HIW GREEN34152045353
37CCC GREEN34132245328
38PTC PINK34142145331
39RMTC BLACK34142146341
40WP BLACK34142147335
41SS-LT GOLD24111940304
42GR SILVER24111940301
43CM ORANGE25171839315
44BM BLUE25181740308
45GTC MAROON25142148341
46CACM BLUE25122352357
47LEBTC YELLOW1582247326
48HW YELLOW16122352376
49GPTC RED16102555367
50CVTA GREEN1682756363
51GR NAVY1662960390
52TTA-E GOLD07102552350
53WP-G GREEN0782756374
54CACM GOLD0762959384
55SS-D GREEN0782759384
56RMTC GREEN0772859376

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jordan Arnell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.73
Juli Furtek
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.70
Kelly Henrichs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.38
Liz Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.14
Laura Morin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Asbury
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tonya Rasmussen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Henrichs + Juli Furtek3260% games+16.5% vs expected
Jordan Arnell + Tonya Rasmussen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Arnell
41W–16L career · 6 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Juli Furtek
32W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Kelly Henrichs
29W–21L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Liz Miller
30W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.38
Laura Morin
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Jennifer Asbury
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tonya Rasmussen
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.