Teams

RMTC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs NJ TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Solano / Alexandra Zabierek vs Karen Stanley / Eryn Johnson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Graham / Marya Howell vs Regina Stewart / Melanie Abel0-6, 4-6
2023-05-26vs MEA TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesVANESSA Bean / Alexandra Zabierek vs Kylie Crandall / Kimberly Weintraub6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCheryl Cavanaugh vs Susan Dalgleish6-1, 6-1
2023-05-24vs TTA-E BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Cavanaugh / Amy Franke vs Ann Forte / Laura Harris4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEnrica Nicoli Aldini / Grace Graham vs Cynthia Davis / Viji Duncan1-6, 4-6
2023-05-17vs CVTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Franke / Grace Graham vs Kristen Keller / Natalie Richardson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEnrica Nicoli Aldini / VANESSA Bean vs Christina Davies / Joni Roberts1-6, 1-6
2023-05-03vs NJ GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Franke / Alyssa Solano vs Katie Keighley / Kristen Lovely0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCheryl Cavanaugh vs Svitlana Pylypenko6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Zabierek / Grace Graham vs Barb McEahern / Jacqueline Wierzba0-6, 0-6
2023-04-26vs RCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Cavanaugh / Marya Howell vs Piper Connelly / Sara Wang3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Franke / Alexandra Zabierek vs Mandy Sutton / Heather Huelsman2-6, 3-6
2023-04-19vs BCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesVANESSA Bean / Marya Howell vs Stephanie Retchless / Ana Hees0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Solano / Grace Graham vs Catherine Ruelas / Paige Walker1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings56 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BCC GOLD7026925248
2SS-LT MAROON61251022249
3LEBTC PINK61251026251
4ATC GREEN61231232298
5GTC YELLOW61221334296
6KNO GOLD51201022244
7MEA GOLD52241124264
8CVTA BLACK52251029271
9LTFC ORANGE52221332307
10WP PINK52211432264
11EM YELLOW52231232295
12CVTA NAVY52211434323
13BRMST YELLOW52201535294
14KC-RH PINK52191637301
15SS-LT TEAL52171838297
16PRKR RED52181739324
17HV SILVER52201539323
18KC-CC ORANGE43211431245
19PCC SILVER43231231253
20BTA-C ORANGE43201532285
21KC-CC NAVY43201535303
22CVTA GOLD43191636305
23SKY GREY43211436295
24APR-U BLUE43171839312
25TTA-E PINK43181740314
26CHCC RED43161943345
27KC-RH GOLD34181736294
28GAC PURPLE34191637297
29BRMST SILVER34171838306
30HFII ORANGE34181738305
31CR-DC GREEN34161940311
32RCC RED34161941311
33MC NAVY34161941302
34VC TEAL34171841310
35PCC GOLD34161942313
36HIW GREEN34152045353
37CCC GREEN34132245328
38PTC PINK34142145331
39RMTC BLACK34142146341
40WP BLACK34142147335
41SS-LT GOLD24111940304
42GR SILVER24111940301
43CM ORANGE25171839315
44BM BLUE25181740308
45GTC MAROON25142148341
46CACM BLUE25122352357
47LEBTC YELLOW1582247326
48HW YELLOW16122352376
49GPTC RED16102555367
50CVTA GREEN1682756363
51GR NAVY1662960390
52TTA-E GOLD07102552350
53WP-G GREEN0782756374
54CACM GOLD0762959384
55SS-D GREEN0782759384
56RMTC GREEN0772859376

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Cheryl Cavanaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.65
VANESSA Bean
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Amy Franke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Alyssa Solano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.19
Grace Graham
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.10
Enrica Nicoli Aldini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Alexandra Zabierek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Franke + Alexandra Zabierek2342% games−4.5% vs expected
Grace Graham + Alexandra Zabierek0525% games−12.4% vs expected
Grace Graham + Amy Franke1444% gamesnot enough data
Enrica Nicoli Aldini + Amy Franke224 matchesnot enough data
Grace Graham + Enrica Nicoli Aldini033 matchesnot enough data
Enrica Nicoli Aldini + Alexandra Zabierek033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cheryl Cavanaugh
29W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
VANESSA Bean
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
2.5
Amy Franke
22W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
Alyssa Solano
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Grace Graham
11W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Enrica Nicoli Aldini
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Alexandra Zabierek
10W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.