Teams

NJ ORANGE

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-19vs LTA-Q BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Gall / John Astle vs Olimpia Mejia / Kevin Edwards4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLynne Monnar / John Fruit vs Dewi Win / Brad Haigis0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-12vs MEA PURPLEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Gall / John Astle vs Kristi Elting / Samuel Elting6-1, 6-2
2024-05-05vs BRMST NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynne Monnar / John Astle vs Jeanne Peoples / Kody Riley3-6, 5-7
2024-04-28vs BRMST REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesAntonio Vigil / Becky Hodous vs Stacey Mari / David Thompson5-7, 3-6
2024-04-21vs LAC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesLynne Monnar / Antonio Vigil vs Tolley Sink / Clayton McLaughlin0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHilary Navy / John Astle vs Christine Payne / Lyndon Moller7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAngela Harper / Greg Aigner vs Hilary Hartwig / Idi Omar2-6, 0-6
2024-04-07vs MEA YELLOWLost 02
L#2 DoublesBecky Hodous / Antonio Vigil vs Heather Middleton / Keith Fagan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynne Monnar / Greg Aigner vs Mary Jensen / Luke Middleton6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Ian Lane
published
3.77
Angela Harper
published 4
3.71
John Fruit
published
3.63
Antonio Vigil
published 4
3.51
Becky Hodous
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
John Astle
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Lynne Monnar
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Greg Aigner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Julie Gall
published
Donald Harper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Gall + John Astle8550% games−0.4% vs expected
Donald Harper + Angela Harper71044% gamesnot enough data
Julie Gall + Greg Aigner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ian Lane
17W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.24
4
Angela Harper
29W–31L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
John Fruit
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Antonio Vigil
7W–25L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Becky Hodous
120W–132L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
John Astle
131W–105L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Lynne Monnar
110W–98L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Greg Aigner
36W–51L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Julie Gall
22W–30L career · no lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
3.06
Donald Harper
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.