Teams

NJ GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-27vs RHCC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesVictoria Coulson / Loraine Glidewell vs Geri Walsh / Nicole Stefanski6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNicole Peiffer vs Kayla Neumann6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndra Gerlesits / Ashriel Lutz vs Liby Zachariah / Jessica Geesaman6-1, 6-2
2026-05-20vs RHCC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesVictoria Coulson / Elizabeth Condon-oakberg vs Sarah Ortega / Molly Pilkington6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndra Gerlesits vs Erin Marcotte6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSarah Poel / Andrea Grant vs Brittany Kinsey / Katie Kessler6-1, 6-3
2026-05-13vs MVCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Condon-oakberg / Ashriel Lutz vs Sarah Holst / Heather Schram3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Peiffer vs Jessica Rowe6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAndrea Grant / Elizabeth Templeton vs Beth Richardson-McHugh / Lori Clark2-6, 2-6
2026-05-08vs LTC-D BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndra Gerlesits / Ashriel Lutz vs Kat Holm / Robin Allis6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLoraine Glidewell vs Karen Bent7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Templeton / Nicole Peiffer vs Lisa Howes / Kelly Sengenberger6-4, 6-3
2026-05-06vs MC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Poel / Nicole Peiffer vs Alexandra Babiy / Jacquelyn Clark6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Grant vs Mary Noto1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAndra Gerlesits / Elizabeth Condon-oakberg vs Nancy Fairchild / Jayne McGarry2-6, 4-6
2026-04-22vs BP REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Peiffer / Andrea Grant vs Kelli E Barker / Shayla Hagburg6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesVictoria Coulson vs Melissa Mizer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Poel / Andra Gerlesits vs Kelli Sommer / Tazia Strausser6-3, 6-0
2026-04-15vs NJ ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria Coulson / Andrea Grant vs Jolene Harrelson / Melissa Sailer6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNicole Peiffer vs Kara Gruver6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Poel / Loraine Glidewell vs Emily Gibson / Julie Johnson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Victoria Coulson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.58
Nicole Peiffer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Loraine Glidewell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Sarah Poel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.45
Andra Gerlesits
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.31
Ashriel Lutz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Andrea Grant
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.91
Elizabeth Condon-oakberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Poel + Victoria Coulson6261% games+13.4% vs expected
Ashriel Lutz + Andra Gerlesits303 matchesnot enough data
Ashriel Lutz + Elizabeth Condon-oakberg213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Poel + Nicole Peiffer303 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Poel + Loraine Glidewell213 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Grant + Nicole Peiffer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Coulson
39W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.61
Nicole Peiffer
18W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.58
Loraine Glidewell
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
2.5
Sarah Poel
33W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Andra Gerlesits
8W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Ashriel Lutz
10W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Andrea Grant
11W–11L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Elizabeth Condon-oakberg
2W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.