Teams

RHCC NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-27vs NJ GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesGeri Walsh / Nicole Stefanski vs Victoria Coulson / Loraine Glidewell2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKayla Neumann vs Nicole Peiffer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLiby Zachariah / Jessica Geesaman vs Andra Gerlesits / Ashriel Lutz1-6, 2-6
2026-05-20vs MVCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesGeri Walsh / Nicole Stefanski vs Sarah Holst / Lori Clark3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKayla Neumann vs Jessica Rowe1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Bundy / Jessica Geesaman vs Sasha Carlson / Sue Akers6-2, 6-2
2026-05-15vs NJ ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Bundy / Amanda Vrbas vs Jolene Harrelson / Jenna Hansen5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAdelaide Del Valle vs Sheri Gann6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Geesaman / Erin Kellenberger vs Katy Thompson / Melissa Sailer4-6, 5-7
2026-05-13vs LTC-D BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesKayla Neumann / Adelaide Del Valle vs Robin Allis / Kat Holm6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGeri Walsh vs Karen Bent3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLiby Zachariah / Erin Kellenberger vs Tara Cronin / Lisa Howes2-6, 2-6
2026-04-29vs RHCC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Bundy / Amanda Vrbas vs Arianne Parisi / Anju Visweswaraiah4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Stefanski vs Maureen Medlock3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAdelaide Del Valle / Kayla Neumann vs Erin Marcotte / Molly Pilkington6-2, 6-1
2026-04-22vs MC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Stefanski / Liby Zachariah vs Alexandra Babiy / Jayne McGarry7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Vrbas vs Meredith Greager6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKayla Neumann / Lori Komon vs Mary Noto / Jacquelyn Clark0-6, 1-6
2026-04-15vs BP REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiby Zachariah / Amanda Vrbas vs Kelli E Barker / Kelli Sommer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Bundy vs Shayla Hagburg7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAdelaide Del Valle / Erin Kellenberger vs Tazia Strausser / Nancy Thompson3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC PURPLE7032310190
2CP GREEN6129614221
3GTC NAVY6126923256
4LTFC BRONZE61241126269
5BTA-C SILVER52231225239
6WP BLUE52211433315
7RHCC NAVY52181743339
8RCC ORANGE34181737303
9SKY GREEN34152045354
10CR-B NAVY34142145339
11MEA NAVY34132252368
12ATC BLUE25142145341
13PH RED25112450352
14LTFC ORANGE1692655382
15CP BLUE0753061385

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Adelaide Del Valle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.38
Amanda Vrbas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.32
Emily Bundy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.24
Nicole Stefanski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.20
Liby Zachariah
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.15
Erin Kellenberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Jessica Geesaman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Geri Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.01
Kayla Neumann
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
1.67
Lori Komon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Vrbas + Emily Bundy6258% games+6.8% vs expected
Emily Bundy + Jessica Geesaman4447% games+2.3% vs expected
Geri Walsh + Nicole Stefanski2445% games−1.9% vs expected
Jessica Geesaman + Erin Kellenberger224 matchesnot enough data
Kayla Neumann + Adelaide Del Valle404 matchesnot enough data
Liby Zachariah + Nicole Stefanski033 matchesnot enough data
Liby Zachariah + Jessica Geesaman123 matchesnot enough data
Emily Bundy + Kayla Neumann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Adelaide Del Valle
11W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.65
2.5
Amanda Vrbas
23W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Emily Bundy
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Nicole Stefanski
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Liby Zachariah
22W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Erin Kellenberger
4W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Jessica Geesaman
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Geri Walsh
13W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Kayla Neumann
7W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Lori Komon
13W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.