Teams

V - Arroyo Vista - Like Fine Wine

2022 USTA Adult 55 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-20vs SoCal/Benton/55&Over7.0WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisa Yoshimura / Sharon Erickson vs Lori Byer / Silvia Benun6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRuth Wager / Lisa Kapur vs Liat Ciardi / Tammy Snyder3-6, 4-6
2022-08-14vs V - PRC WavesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSharon Erickson / Lisa Yoshimura vs Maria Finney / Inna Taranchenko6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Kapur / Linda Chan vs Siri Rochin / Louise Tonin6-4, 6-2
2022-08-06vs V - Royal Aces 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Delaney / Lisa Kapur vs Lynda Demaray / Renee Kieselbach7-6, 6-1
2022-07-30vs SoCal/Benton/55&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslie Wright / Tracee Nilsson vs Sheri Pate / Silvia Benun5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Kapur / Susan Delaney vs Lisa Iezza / Sonia Bekian4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Wager / Adele Valenzuela vs Tammy Snyder / Simone Kelman2-6, 2-6
2022-07-24vs V - PRC WavesWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Kapur / Susan Delaney vs Tammy Morrell / Akemi Martin6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRuth Wager / Lisa Yoshimura vs Maria Finney / Gail Simpson6-1, 6-2
2022-07-17vs V - Royal Aces 55+Won 20
W#2 DoublesLinda Chan / Lisa Yoshimura vs Leanne Helfman / Mary Feldstein6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Kapur / Susan Delaney vs Stacy Ball / Patricia Francisco6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Tracee Nilsson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Lisa Kapur
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Linda Chan
published
3.29
Cindy Giammarrusco
published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Yoshimura
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Susan Delaney
published
3.03
Ruth Wager
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Erickson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Chan + Lisa Kapur4158% games+0.3% vs expected
Cindy Giammarrusco + Lisa Yoshimura21035% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Wager + Lisa Kapur7357% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Yoshimura + Lisa Kapur4256% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Wager + Susan Delaney3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracee Nilsson
52W–89L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Lisa Kapur
142W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
Linda Chan
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Lisa Yoshimura
118W–165L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Susan Delaney
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Ruth Wager
62W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Sharon Erickson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.