Teams

V - Royal Aces 55+

2022 USTA Adult 55 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-06vs V - Arroyo Vista - Like Fine WineSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLynda Demaray / Renee Kieselbach vs Susan Delaney / Lisa Kapur6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Clark / Stacy Ball vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-31vs V - PRC WavesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLeanne Helfman / Renee Kieselbach vs Maria Finney / Inna Taranchenko0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer House / Kathryn Pisaro vs Gail Simpson / Tammy Morrell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-23vs SoCal/Benton/55&Over7.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesStacy Ball / Lynda Demaray vs Liat Ciardi / Houri Kazanjian0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Beth Benton / Paulette Walker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-17vs V - Arroyo Vista - Like Fine WineLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebeca Fuller / Renae Saliano vs Leslie Wright / Sharon Erickson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeanne Helfman / Mary Feldstein vs Linda Chan / Lisa Yoshimura3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStacy Ball / Patricia Francisco vs Lisa Kapur / Susan Delaney4-6, 0-6
2022-07-10vs V - PRC WavesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRenee Kieselbach / Leanne Helfman vs Darcy Antonellis / Arlene Monnar3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLynda Demaray / Renae Saliano vs Gail Simpson / Akemi Martin4-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesStacy Ball / Vicky Modglin vs Louise Tonin / Maria Finney3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Vicky Modglin
published
3.09
Renae Saliano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Mary Feldstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Friedman
published
2.97
2.93
Stacy Ball
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Kathryn Pisaro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Renee Kieselbach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Patricia Francisco
published
Lynda Demaray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renae Saliano + Mary Feldstein202547% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicky Modglin
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Renae Saliano
88W–116L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Mary Feldstein
59W–89L career · 1 line in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
Yvonne Esquerra-Bard
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Kathryn Pisaro
74W–90L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Renee Kieselbach
54W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lynda Demaray
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.