Teams

GTC YELLOW

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 4.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-10vs LTFC ORANGESplit 11
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Jaycox vs Melissa Griese3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Jorgensen / Caroline Carolan vs Carol Jochens / Maribeth Hanzlik6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-29vs MC TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Carolan / Amber Jorgensen vs Barbara Everard / Andrea Philleo6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichelle Degitis vs Cyndy Besselievre6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-27vs LTFC NAVYLost 01
L#1 SinglesMichelle Degitis vs Kim Ripka3-6, 3-6
2023-07-06vs CK GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Carolan / Dagmar Velez vs Margaret Lamb / Susan Jeffries6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Jaycox vs Shannon Kiebler3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Clapham / Michelle Degitis vs Mandy Paul / Jamie Steese4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-29vs PCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Carolan / Laura Montoya vs Michelle Arend / Katie Boggs2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
KC Nettleton
published 4.5
4.27
Michelle Degitis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Dagmar Velez
published 4.5
4.22
Jordan Campbell
published
4.21
Julie Clapham
published
4.19
Laura Montoya
published
4.15
Amber Jorgensen
published 4.5
4.07
Caroline Carolan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.86
Adrienne Jaycox
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Montoya + Julie Clapham3356% games+1.4% vs expected
KC Nettleton + Caroline Carolan8851% games−2.6% vs expected
KC Nettleton + Michelle Degitis224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Degitis + Julie Clapham314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Montoya + Michelle Degitis213 matchesnot enough data
Adrienne Jaycox + Caroline Carolan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
KC Nettleton
55W–57L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Michelle Degitis
90W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Dagmar Velez
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jordan Campbell
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Julie Clapham
44W–27L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
Laura Montoya
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Amber Jorgensen
34W–15L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Caroline Carolan
80W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Adrienne Jaycox
65W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.