Teams

MC TEAL

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-10vs GAC GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Payne / Andrea Philleo vs Kirsten Handler / Kingsley Parsley1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCyndy Besselievre / Danielle Matsuyama vs Michelle Sachs / Julie Wilson1-6, 1-6
2023-08-03vs LTFC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Greenwood / Barbara Everard vs Kristi Savignano / Sonja Russell1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCyndy Besselievre vs Julia Bridgewater5-7, 3-6
2023-07-29vs GTC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Everard / Andrea Philleo vs Caroline Carolan / Amber Jorgensen2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCyndy Besselievre vs Michelle Degitis2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-13vs CK GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Everard / Karen Greenwood vs Megan Melucci / Robyn Klee0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Danielle Matsuyama vs Jamie Steese / Mandy Paul3-6, 4-6
2023-07-06vs PCC GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesCyndy Besselievre vs Midi Daddis5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Barstow / Barbara Everard vs Janine Paulson / Tanja Sukovic3-6, 3-6
2023-06-29vs LTFC ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Greenwood / Victoria Barstow vs Elizabeth Bendalin / Lori Benson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Everard / Andrea Philleo vs Bridget Murdock / Carol Jochens1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Victoria Barstow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Andrea Philleo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Cyndy Besselievre
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.95
Kim Grogan
published
3.92
Karen Greenwood
published
3.77
Barbara Everard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Karen Payne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Greenwood + Cyndy Besselievre3353% games−15.1% vs expected
Barbara Everard + Victoria Barstow224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Victoria Barstow
69W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Andrea Philleo
52W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
Cyndy Besselievre
72W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Kim Grogan
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.95
Karen Greenwood
49W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Barbara Everard
109W–122L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.77
Karen Payne
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.