Teams

WSolomon (Carmel)

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.55 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-08-04vs SRock/HLee (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Jill Halverstam vs Stephanie Rock / Allyson McDonough4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Diman / Tricia Magee vs Hilary Lee / Robin Smith5-7, 6-7
2024-07-31vs CTerry/MBurns (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Erwin / Lindy Gignac vs Kimberly Rupnarine / Mary Toomy6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNatalie Stewart / Tricia Magee vs Rae Lynn Pope / Barbara Davis5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-07-17vs JFontaine (Col Beatty)Split 11
W#2 DoublesTraci Semones / Jill Halverstam vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTricia Magee / Natalie Stewart vs Gladys Shinmoto / Jennifer Siddall3-6, 3-6
2024-07-10vs KHart/MWright (Blakeney)Split 11
L#1 DoublesLindy Gignac / Molly Dwyer vs Smita Thakur / Michelle Wright4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTricia Magee / Natalie Stewart vs Wendy Rossi / Anita Stewart-Stover2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-01vs AIngalls (CSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Erwin / Suzannah Hicks vs Lisa Anderson / Stephanie Guffin6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Jill Halverstam vs Tracey Rosenberg / Ivy Tedrick6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaurie Diman / Carrie Carickhoff vs Heather Griffith / Amy Reynolds0-6, 5-7
2024-06-26vs CTerry/MBurns (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Solomon / Suzannah Hicks vs Sophie Graham / Kimberly Rupnarine6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Halverstam / Molly Dwyer vs Julia Hensley / Shefali Chudgar6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Natalie Stewart vs Rae Lynn Pope / Jacqui Gentile4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-19vs SRock/HLee (Piper Glen)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSuzannah Hicks / Paige Whitney vs Jennifer Martin / Lauren Pruett Strickler6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaurie Diman / Maria Sevigny vs Cindy Rhoten / Hilary Lee2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-17vs KHart/MWright (Blakeney)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzannah Hicks / Paige Whitney vs India Branker / Katy Hart6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Halverstam / Sara Lineberger vs Sanami Nakai / Dipti Jagannath2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Carickhoff / Maria Sevigny vs Rachel Grantham / Deepti Dua1-6, 0-6
2024-06-12vs JFontaine (Col Beatty)Won 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Solomon / Lindy Gignac vs Tracy Stamey / Paula Donoghue7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Jill Halverstam vs Alison Oxendine / Silvia Engel3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTricia Magee / Carrie Carickhoff vs Jasmine Fontaine / Elaine Eisenbaum6-2, 6-3
2024-05-29vs AIngalls (CSRC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesMolly Dwyer / Maria Sevigny vs Renee Preece / Ivy Tedrick6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaurie Diman / Tricia Magee vs Kristen Ziemer / Amy Reynolds1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Paige Whitney
published
3.80
Traci Semones
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Suzannah Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Amy Erwin
published 4
3.59
Molly Dwyer
published
3.58
Sara Lineberger
published
3.54
Callie Tucker
published 3.5
3.52
Lindy Gignac
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Wendy Solomon
published
3.34
Maria Sevigny
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.30
Jill Halverstam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Laurie Diman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Tricia Magee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Diman + Tricia Magee242251% games−3.6% vs expected
Lindy Gignac + Suzannah Hicks61239% games−8.9% vs expected
Jill Halverstam + Maria Sevigny224 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Solomon + Lindy Gignac123 matchesnot enough data
Jill Halverstam + Suzannah Hicks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Whitney
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Traci Semones
139W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Suzannah Hicks
98W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Amy Erwin
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Molly Dwyer
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.59
Sara Lineberger
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Callie Tucker
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
4
Lindy Gignac
115W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.52
Wendy Solomon
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Maria Sevigny
105W–47L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Jill Halverstam
90W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3
Laurie Diman
121W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Tricia Magee
122W–94L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Carrie Carickhoff
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.