Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Pendergras)(EPCC)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Maese/18&over/4.0W71301028272
2GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Delgado)(EPTC#1)71281230322
3GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Hufft)(FB)53241636335
4GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Tan)(EPTC#3)53241638304
5GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Pendergras)(EPCC)44231739336
6GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Missirian)(EPTC#2)44192148376
7GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Johnson)(EPTC#5)35182249353
8GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Cunningham)(TW)17112961412
9GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Phillips)(NMSU)000000
10GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Mattingly)(CCC)0833775467

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Ashleigh Barreno
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Belle Middagh
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.56
Ashley Bowling
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.31
Andrea McMillan
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Allison Furman
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Anna Camille Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Genevieve Pendergras
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Jessica Porras
usually #2 Singles 24%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Karla di Pascuale
usually #2 Singles 41%, also #1 Singles 24% · published
Kathy Cartwright
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Laura Leslie
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Margaret Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Megan Harris
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Rebecca Spencer Tavitas
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Stephanie Zaragoza
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Tina Gute
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Traci Hooker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Cartwright + Ashley Bowling13265% games+6.8% vs expected
Patricia Alvarez + Genevieve Pendergras2354% games+0.5% vs expected
Genevieve Pendergras + Ashley Bowling6453% games−3.4% vs expected
Belle Middagh + Traci Hooker71047% games−6.3% vs expected
Tina Gute + Genevieve Pendergras11458% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Meyer + Belle Middagh4745% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Cartwright + Anna Camille Kerr8254% gamesnot enough data
Megan Harris + Ashley Bowling6269% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashleigh Barreno
49W–30L career · 10 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Belle Middagh
38W–39L career · 10 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Ashley Bowling
59W–43L career · 25 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Andrea McMillan
8W–6L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Allison Furman
31W–21L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Anna Camille Kerr
42W–28L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Genevieve Pendergras
68W–38L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessica Porras
22W–8L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karla di Pascuale
70W–41L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Cartwright
98W–60L career · 20 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Leslie
48W–65L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Meyer
51W–43L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Harris
67W–10L career · 32 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Alvarez
83W–75L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Spencer Tavitas
32W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Zaragoza
71W–61L career · 27 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Gute
74W–62L career · 24 lines in 2024
not enough data
Traci Hooker
27W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.