Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Cunningham)(TW)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Maese/18&over/4.0W71301028272
2GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Delgado)(EPTC#1)71281230322
3GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Hufft)(FB)53241636335
4GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Tan)(EPTC#3)53241638304
5GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Pendergras)(EPCC)44231739336
6GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Missirian)(EPTC#2)44192148376
7GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Johnson)(EPTC#5)35182249353
8GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Cunningham)(TW)17112961412
9GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Phillips)(NMSU)000000
10GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Mattingly)(CCC)0833775467

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Christina Lanza
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.27
Damaris Desbois
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Catherine Nicholson Parker
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Chrystel Perreault
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
Elena Liem
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Katherine Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Lia Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Lorena Reynolds
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Martha Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marykathleen Towle
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Patty Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Liem
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Yvana Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Morrow + Lia Shelton13656% games−0.5% vs expected
Sharon Liem + Martha Cunningham10254% games−5.2% vs expected
Katherine Harrison + Damaris Desbois12950% gamesnot enough data
Marykathleen Towle + Chrystel Perreault4745% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Reynolds + Martha Cunningham4344% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Reynolds + Chrystel Perreault213 matchesnot enough data
Lorena Reynolds + Damaris Desbois213 matchesnot enough data
Lorena Reynolds + Lia Shelton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Lanza
19W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.37
3.5
Damaris Desbois
71W–44L career · 20 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Nicholson Parker
15W–12L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Chrystel Perreault
91W–93L career · 18 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Elena Liem
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Harrison
22W–17L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lia Shelton
141W–90L career · 28 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lorena Reynolds
78W–105L career · 27 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Cunningham
45W–31L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marykathleen Towle
41W–84L career · 31 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patty Morrow
51W–39L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Liem
29W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yvana Sanchez
38W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.