Teams

CK BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs HW REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeni Cuddie / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Mellenie Goebel / Tiffanie Lenderman0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBibi Kearney vs JULIE HANCOCK0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCathy McFarland / Susan OBrien vs Lauren Francis / Holly Shrewsbury6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Fellows / Lynette Hosler vs Annie Basham / Barbara Superka6-3, 6-4
2023-07-15vs SS-D BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesCathy McFarland / Susan OBrien vs Toni Lapp / Nancy Railey-Borchelt7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Pollman vs Traci Henry3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Fellows / Lynette Hosler vs Jane Lundwall / Maria Blakney6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAura Leigh Ferguson / Bibi Kearney vs Nancy Hogue / Darlene Gonzales4-6, 3-6
2023-07-03vs LEBTC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesSusan OBrien / Jeni Cuddie vs Kristi Snow / Cindy McFadden6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJennifer Pollman vs Amy Hansel5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBibi Kearney / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Alice Heerse / Alison Cargo2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErika Thomas / Lisa Fellows vs Maggie Bronson / Christine Gish7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-26vs KC-RH REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesErika Thomas / Lynette Hosler vs Elizabeth Crites / Marlene Samokishyn6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSusan OBrien vs Michelle Butzke6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJeni Cuddie / Cathy McFarland vs Lori Goulding / Maria Fischer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Fellows / Jennifer Pollman vs Danette Henderson / Kelly Mair2-6, 1-6
2023-06-20vs KC-CC SILVERSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCathy McFarland / Erika Thomas vs Katie Policaro / Gina Schulz3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSusan OBrien vs Ashley Campsie7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Pollman / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Laurie Ross / Kristen Hoffman4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Fellows / Jeni Cuddie vs Carolyn Wachuta / Elizabeth Rao6-1, 6-0
2023-06-19vs SS-HP REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pollman / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Tonya Berry / Nicole Poulos1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSusan OBrien vs Brooke Wagner4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCathy McFarland / Bibi Kearney vs Wendy Hynes / Lindsey Sittko2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLynette Hosler / Erika Thomas vs Cherie Mitchell / Elizabeth Whittaker1-6, 2-6
2023-06-05vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan OBrien / Cathy McFarland vs Susie McKenzie / Marie O'Neill4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeni Cuddie vs Krista Krusz6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesErika Thomas / Jennifer Pollman vs Cortney Eisses / Adriana Sosa6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBibi Kearney / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Carissa Zevallos / Kris Edwards6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Susan OBrien
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.85
Jeni Cuddie
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.55
Lisa Fellows
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Cathy McFarland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Aura Leigh Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Bibi Kearney
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Erika Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.25
Jennifer Pollman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lynette Hosler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Lucero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy McFarland + Susan OBrien5454% games+3.9% vs expected
Lynette Hosler + Lisa Fellows2350% games+1.8% vs expected
Susan OBrien + Jeni Cuddie7257% games+0.6% vs expected
Lynette Hosler + Erika Thomas41442% games−1.2% vs expected
Lisa Fellows + Cathy McFarland3944% games−4.5% vs expected
Lisa Fellows + Jeni Cuddie314 matchesnot enough data
Cathy McFarland + Jeni Cuddie224 matchesnot enough data
Bibi Kearney + Aura Leigh Ferguson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan OBrien
76W–50L career · 7 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Jeni Cuddie
57W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Lisa Fellows
49W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Cathy McFarland
18W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Aura Leigh Ferguson
42W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Bibi Kearney
4W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Erika Thomas
7W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Pollman
24W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.25
Lynette Hosler
10W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Lucero
0W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.