Teams

LEBTC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesJulie Greco / Alison Cargo vs Lydia Sfeir / Susie McKenzie6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Krista Krusz4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaggie Bronson / Christine Gish vs Marie O'Neill / Adriana Sosa3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlice Heerse / Mary LePino Butler vs Kris Edwards / Carissa Zevallos3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-07-11vs HW REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesCindy McFadden / Julie Greco vs Annie Basham / JULIE HANCOCK6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Mellenie Goebel3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristi Snow / Maggie Bronson vs Vivian Perla / Holly Georgelos6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlice Heerse / Alison Cargo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-03vs CK BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesKristi Snow / Cindy McFadden vs Susan OBrien / Jeni Cuddie3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Jennifer Pollman5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlice Heerse / Alison Cargo vs Bibi Kearney / Aura Leigh Ferguson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaggie Bronson / Christine Gish vs Erika Thomas / Lisa Fellows5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-28vs SS-HP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristi Snow / Cindy McFadden vs Wendy Hynes / Lindsey McGraw7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlison Cargo vs Nicole Bolick1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlice Heerse / Maggie Bronson vs Elizabeth Whittaker / Nicole Poulos2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Gish / Julie Greco vs Karen Keehan Odendahl / Cherie Mitchell7-6, 6-2
2023-06-26vs SS-D BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesKristi Snow / Cindy McFadden vs Maria Blakney / Jane Lundwall6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Traci Henry3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLorraine Devens / Julie Greco vs Nancy Hogue / Toni Lapp6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Gish / Alison Cargo vs Darlene Gonzales / Nancy Railey-Borchelt6-0, 6-4
2023-06-20vs KC-CC SILVERLost 13
L#1 DoublesCindy McFadden / Julie Greco vs Ashley Campsie / Kristen Hoffman3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Katie Policaro6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Gish / Maggie Bronson vs Laurie Ross / Anne Steigerwald5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Heerse / Alison Cargo vs Kathryn Tobey / Elizabeth Rao2-6, 5-7
2023-06-19vs KC-RH REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesKristi Snow / Cindy McFadden vs Renee Martinez / Gina Akins2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Carissa Hollander1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLorraine Devens / Julie Greco vs Janie Ramseier / Lori Goulding5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary LePino Butler / Alice Heerse vs Christie Mann / Marlene Samokishyn1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Alison Cargo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.89
Christine Gish
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Cindy McFadden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Alice Heerse
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Amy Hansel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Julie Greco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kristi Snow
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lorraine Devens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Bronson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Mary LePino Butler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy McFadden + Julie Greco4350% games+6.0% vs expected
Lorraine Devens + Julie Greco2550% games+4.5% vs expected
Cindy McFadden + Kristi Snow12453% games+2.3% vs expected
Maggie Bronson + Mary LePino Butler1441% games−0.1% vs expected
Maggie Bronson + Alice Heerse3440% games−3.9% vs expected
Cindy McFadden + Mary LePino Butler2635% games−6.2% vs expected
Alice Heerse + Mary LePino Butler21031% games−9.8% vs expected
Cindy McFadden + Lorraine Devens134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alison Cargo
51W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Christine Gish
38W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Cindy McFadden
22W–21L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Alice Heerse
12W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Amy Hansel
14W–28L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Greco
20W–19L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristi Snow
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lorraine Devens
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maggie Bronson
10W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary LePino Butler
6W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.