Teams

Team 14 Between the Lines

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-13vs Team 7 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#2 DoublesSibyll Jones / Jeannie Ng vs Elizabeth Clarke / Erika Hoyt3-6, 3-3
2022-04-01vs Team 21 WGCC 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesSibyll Jones / Colleen Peacher vs Gillian Curran / Rebecca Metro6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-20vs Team 16 MatchPointSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hamilton / Colleen Peacher vs Nancy Rowland / Suzanne Swanhorst7-6, 4-4
L#2 DoublesSibyll Jones / Jeannie Ng vs Amanda Wenzel / Susan Velasco4-6, 4-5
2022-03-06vs Team 4Won 10
W#1 DoublesColleen Peacher / Elizabeth Hamilton vs Mary Newburn / Judy Curry6-3, 6-0
2022-02-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesSibyll Jones / Victoria Roberts vs Courtney Johnson / Rosalyn Cooperman-Korff5-7, 6-2
2022-02-16vs Team 11 3.5 OVER SERVEDLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hamilton / Sibyll Jones vs Mary Chlopecki / Joan-Marie Turchiano0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-06vs Team 20Won 10
W#1 DoublesStacy Huisman / Colleen Peacher vs Sandra Wolk / Mary Burke Fox6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.38
Stacy Huisman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Colleen Peacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Sibyll Jones
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Hamilton
published 3.5
3.05
Jeannie Ng
published
2.88
Robin Dunning
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Huisman + Colleen Peacher14362% games+8.1% vs expected
Stacy Huisman + Sibyll Jones9161% gamesnot enough data
Sibyll Jones + Colleen Peacher8159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tana Jankowiak
103W–71L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Stacy Huisman
61W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Colleen Peacher
119W–124L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Sibyll Jones
149W–177L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Elizabeth Hamilton
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Jeannie Ng
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Robin Dunning
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.88
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.