Teams

ALMADEN VAC 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-06vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5DWon 30
W#1 DoublesPATRICE DAVIS / Nitika Korla vs Jennifer Koo / Liz Lawler6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Ruiz / Michelle Rotzin vs Gigi Harvey / Melissa Vuckovich7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnita Nguyen / Maryam Malekian vs Debby Heicklen / Karen Rogge7-6, 6-0
2025-02-15vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5DWon 30
W#1 DoublesPari Pham / Anna Wielosz vs Theresa Dao-Makiyama / Jennifer Koo6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNelli Dijkhuizen / Nitika Korla vs Yveline Coulond / Svetlana Tounkel6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Plaia / JULIE PHAM vs Karen Rogge / Marnie Mar6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Catherine Liang
published 3.5
3.38
Pari Pham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Stacie Pittenger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Nitika Korla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Anita Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lori Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Anna Wielosz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Catherine Plaia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
JULIE PHAM
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Maryam Malekian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Deborah Hao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Nelli Dijkhuizen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Wendy Penunuri
published
3.11
Mirta Luque
published
3.04
Jeanine Smith
published
3.02
Elaine Chiu
published
3.00
Michelle Rotzin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
PATRICE DAVIS
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Pittenger + Pari Pham3347% games+3.1% vs expected
Lori Ruiz + Michelle Rotzin1445% games−6.5% vs expected
Jeanine Smith + Lori Ruiz134 matchesnot enough data
Stacie Pittenger + Nelli Dijkhuizen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Liang
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Pari Pham
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stacie Pittenger
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Nitika Korla
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Anita Nguyen
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Lori Ruiz
6W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anna Wielosz
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Plaia
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
JULIE PHAM
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.24
Maryam Malekian
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Deborah Hao
10W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Nelli Dijkhuizen
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Wendy Penunuri
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Mirta Luque
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Jeanine Smith
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Elaine Chiu
8W–23L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Michelle Rotzin
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
PATRICE DAVIS
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.