Teams

LAGUNITAS CC 18AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-09vs MARIN TC 18AW3.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Caldwell / Abigail Lodge vs Erin Shippey / Jamie Papadimos6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKatie Hyde vs Helen Luttemo0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Hale / Lida Treadwell vs Brenda Dorian / Jennifer Sterne7-6, 6-4
2025-06-02vs MT TAM RC 18AW3.5A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeghan Caldwell / Elizabeth Fattouh vs Michelle Rau / Ilana Roth6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMargaret Pogue vs Sara Crate0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMadeleine Allen / Yolande Heller vs Katherine Matso / Taemee Hur4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Meghan Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Abigail Lodge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Madeleine Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Hale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Lida Treadwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Alexandra Treene
published 3.5
3.06
Helen Ortiz
published
3.02
Joanna Hobson
published
2.96
Margaret Pogue
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Yolande Heller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Kelly Dwinells
published
2.80
Joanna Dachs
published
Elizabeth Fattouh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Robinson
published
Katie Hyde
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meghan Caldwell
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Abigail Lodge
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Madeleine Allen
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Catherine Hale
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lida Treadwell
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Alexandra Treene
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Helen Ortiz
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Joanna Hobson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Margaret Pogue
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Yolande Heller
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kelly Dwinells
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Joanna Dachs
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Elizabeth Fattouh
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Robinson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Hyde
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.