Teams

MARIN TC 18AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-09vs LAGUNITAS CC 18AW3.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Shippey / Jamie Papadimos vs Meghan Caldwell / Abigail Lodge1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHelen Luttemo vs Katie Hyde6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrenda Dorian / Jennifer Sterne vs Catherine Hale / Lida Treadwell6-7, 4-6
2025-05-22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGita Stiritz vs Holly Myers0-6, 2-6
2025-05-16Won 10
W#1 SinglesGita Stiritz vs Rory Weinstein6-4, 7-6
2025-04-23vs SCOTT VALLEY 18AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 SinglesGita Stiritz vs Jennifer Wilkoff3-6, 3-6
2025-04-21vs ROLLING HILLS 18AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 SinglesGita Stiritz vs Lucie Powers2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Carol Treadway
published 3.5
3.42
Marlies Zeisler
published
3.33
Helen Luttemo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Brenda Dorian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Karen Loebbaka
published
3.21
Michelle Verloop
published
3.21
Katie Magnuson
published
3.13
Jamie Papadimos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Molie Malone
published
3.02
Erin Shippey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Gita Stiritz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.82
Jen Reidy
published
Jennifer Sterne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Luba Shveyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Dorian + Carol Treadway5165% games+11.1% vs expected
Michelle Verloop + Carol Treadway224 matchesnot enough data
Molie Malone + Katie Magnuson123 matchesnot enough data
Molie Malone + Karen Loebbaka213 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Dorian + Karen Loebbaka123 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Papadimos + Michelle Verloop213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Treadway
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
Marlies Zeisler
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Helen Luttemo
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Brenda Dorian
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Karen Loebbaka
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Michelle Verloop
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Katie Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jamie Papadimos
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Molie Malone
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Erin Shippey
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
3
Gita Stiritz
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Jen Reidy
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Jennifer Sterne
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Luba Shveyd
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.