Teams

OC Irvine Heritage Park Irvine - Tiffney - Sun11

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesRomi Archer / Daniela Gavaldon vs Kathy Kelly / Jenny Freck2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAzin Mirchi vs Josephine Garrett6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatricia Santiago / Kathy Salter vs Cheryl Gates / Janna McConnell6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTiffney Beckloff / Jackie Guthrie vs Annie Clark / Jacqueline Jernigan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Daniela Gavaldon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Jackie Guthrie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Romi Archer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Michelle Duenas
published
3.65
Ladawn Stone
published
3.62
Marcella Cangelosi
published
3.53
Patricia Santiago
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Azin Mirchi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.49
Kathy Salter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Nicole Festini
published
3.34
Stacey Choi
published
3.25
Darlene Redburn
published 3.5
3.13
Renee Beckloff
published
3.00
Tiffney Beckloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Festini + Stacey Choi9655% games+14.8% vs expected
Michelle Duenas + Kathy Salter4354% games+8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniela Gavaldon
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Jackie Guthrie
33W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
Romi Archer
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Michelle Duenas
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Ladawn Stone
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Marcella Cangelosi
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Patricia Santiago
4W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Azin Mirchi
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kathy Salter
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Nicole Festini
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Stacey Choi
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34
3.5
Darlene Redburn
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Renee Beckloff
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Tiffney Beckloff
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.