Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Cheryl Sat 11:30

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-05vs OC CMTC - Dee - Sun9Split 11
L#2 DoublesJosephine Garrett / Lindsay Kimmes vs Rikki Scharnell / Cathy Jackson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Lauren Prelesnik vs Dee Harriman / Jody Brennan6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Cheryl Gates vs Elyzabeth Pham / Taeeui Ham6-4, 6-4
2025-03-01vs OC Team Courage - LPC - NishaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Janna McConnell vs Yukari Nobuhara / Cindy Pham4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Michelle Bachand vs Daniela Schardinger / Gretchen Cuzick7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Sarah King vs Laura Schlom / Ellen Aistars4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesKathy Kelly / Jenny Freck vs Romi Archer / Daniela Gavaldon6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJosephine Garrett vs Azin Mirchi2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Gates / Janna McConnell vs Patricia Santiago / Kathy Salter2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnie Clark / Jacqueline Jernigan vs Tiffney Beckloff / Jackie Guthrie3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRosalinda Fazio vs Athena Wong3-6, 3-6
2025-01-18vs SoCal/Lee/40&Over4.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Josephine Garrett vs Valentina Stepanova / Liz Rapoza0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Callas / Catherine Fullerton vs Stephanie Tarzia / Bonnie Lee6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Cheryl Gates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Catherine Fullerton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Christine Callas
published 4
3.64
Lindsay Kimmes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Janna McConnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Lisa Rhoads
published
3.62
Jane Gibb
published
3.57
Shelly Hilliard
published
3.57
Mary Read
published
3.53
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.52
Jill Muranaka
published
3.45
Lauren Prelesnik
published
3.42
Josephine Garrett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Annie Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Jacqueline Jernigan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jenny Freck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Amen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Jernigan + Annie Clark4548% games+0.6% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Lauren Prelesnik2542% games−1.0% vs expected
Cheryl Gates + Janna McConnell3548% games−4.8% vs expected
Lindsay Kimmes + Josephine Garrett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Gates
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Catherine Fullerton
92W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Lindsay Kimmes
40W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Janna McConnell
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Lisa Rhoads
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Jane Gibb
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
Shelly Hilliard
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
Mary Read
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jill Muranaka
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.52
Lauren Prelesnik
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Annie Clark
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Jacqueline Jernigan
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Jenny Freck
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Amen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.