Teams

OC Cute on the Court - LPC - Mak - Sun11

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.15 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-12vs SoCal/Lee/40&Over4.0WWon 20
W#2 DoublesSUSAN BROWN / Mina Whitlock vs Bonnie Lee / Valentina Stepanova6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHye Jin Robertson / Taeeui Ham vs Michelle Smith / Sayuri Maruna6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-05vs OC Costa Mesa TC - Tricia - Sat9Won 30
W#1 DoublesHye Jin Robertson / Kelly Davis vs Christine Dunbar / Yoko Ohigashi7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVera Garrard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMandy Cuan / Risa Chung vs Holly Bruning / Robin Briones6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesElyzabeth Pham / Taeeui Ham vs Catherine Fullerton / Cheryl Gates4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesTheresa Jeong / SUSAN BROWN vs Romi Archer / Daniela Gavaldon6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTaeeui Ham / Hatien Nguyen vs Nicole Festini / Stacey Choi6-2, 7-5
2025-02-23vs OC Fullerton TC - Lori - Sat10Won 30
W#1 DoublesSUSAN BROWN / Taeeui Ham vs Arison Hong / Keiko Jun6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHye Jin Robertson / Meghan Lake vs Sue Littman / Lori Mahoney Jones6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Jeong / Elyzabeth Pham vs Suzanne Kavoossi / Viviana Kim6-3, 6-2
2025-02-09vs OC CMTC - Dee - Sun9Won 30
W#1 DoublesSUSAN BROWN / Theresa Jeong vs Jody Brennan / Stacy Tzur6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMina Whitlock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVera Garrard / Kathy Zepeda Emerzian vs Terri Rasmussen / Julie Hull7-5, 6-3
2025-01-26vs OC Team Courage - LPC - NishaWon 20
W#1 DoublesHatien Nguyen / Kathy Zepeda Emerzian vs Daniela Schardinger / MALU NORTON3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHye Jin Robertson / Kelly Davis vs Nancy Casey / Michelle Sinclair6-3, 6-3
2025-01-19vs OC Mission Viejo - Doreen - Sat12Won 20
W#1 SinglesRisa Chung vs Amy Berk6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Davis / Hatien Nguyen vs Doreen Brinkman / Terry Ward6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Mina Whitlock
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.04
Hye Jin Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.02
Theresa Jeong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Risa Chung
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.97
SUSAN BROWN
published
3.94
Mandy Cuan
published
3.92
Elyzabeth Pham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Megan Osborn
published
3.84
Hatien Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
3.79
Taeeui Ham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Vera Garrard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
Meghan Lake
published
3.70
Julie Mak
published
3.69
Gia Bao Le
published 4
3.62
Kat Thieu
published
3.57
Chunyan Chen
published 4
3.49
Kelly Davis
published
Nicole Doan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hye Jin Robertson + Mina Whitlock6653% games+0.6% vs expected
Hye Jin Robertson + Taeeui Ham5067% gamesnot enough data
Mina Whitlock + Theresa Jeong4162% gamesnot enough data
Hye Jin Robertson + Risa Chung224 matchesnot enough data
Hye Jin Robertson + Theresa Jeong134 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Jeong + Elyzabeth Pham404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mina Whitlock
121W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Hye Jin Robertson
160W–80L career · 11 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Theresa Jeong
83W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Risa Chung
157W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.00
SUSAN BROWN
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Mandy Cuan
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Elyzabeth Pham
152W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Megan Osborn
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Hatien Nguyen
130W–95L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Taeeui Ham
95W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Vera Garrard
110W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
Meghan Lake
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Julie Mak
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Gia Bao Le
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
Kat Thieu
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Chunyan Chen
17W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Kelly Davis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Nicole Doan
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.