Teams

Toleu- 40+ Love S23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-13vs Bartz/Gustafson 4.0 40+ S23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Ragain vs Leah Galaudet6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-22vs Reiling-Stout 40+ 4.0 S23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPamela van Ert / Christine Ragain vs Jennifer Magnuson / Frances Barry1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-01vs Donovan- Deuces 40+ S23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Curfman / Christine Ragain vs Joan Bakken / Suzanne Fenton6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Christine Ragain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
4.00
Shelley Wagener
published
3.80
Michelle Finley
published
3.80
Dede Montgomery
published 4
Alicia Stratman
published 4
3.71
Carol Engstrom
published 4
3.66
Lori Mosser
published
3.66
Krysta Clark
published
3.62
Carol Samuelson
published 4
3.62
Julie Speetzen
published
3.61
Kelly Regan
published
3.53
Barbara Brill
published 4
3.52
Pamela van Ert
published
3.51
Katie Hammond
published
3.49
Sarah Curfman
published
3.10
Kathleen Geherin
published
Karla Toleu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Brill + Michelle Finley1840% games−7.3% vs expected
Barbara Brill + Pamela van Ert033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Ragain
50W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
4.04
Shelley Wagener
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Michelle Finley
35W–50L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Dede Montgomery
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Alicia Stratman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Carol Engstrom
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Lori Mosser
18W–33L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Krysta Clark
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Carol Samuelson
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Julie Speetzen
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Kelly Regan
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Barbara Brill
9W–54L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Pamela van Ert
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
Katie Hammond
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Sarah Curfman
58W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kathleen Geherin
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
Karla Toleu
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.