Teams

PD55/Nance/FTC

2026 STA Adult Combo 55 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 13 5:30 PM
Dr. Eddie Floyd Florence Tennis Center
Sep 27 5:30 PM
Palmetto Tennis Center
2026-08-30vs PD55/Sari/PTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesCrystal Rogers / Kathy Gatlin vs Tammy Achziger / Pat Gleaton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRonelle van Heerden / Katie Hensley vs Lynn McElveen / Lyndy Graham6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDruanne Freeman / Marlene Ward vs Gina Smith / Marie Player5-7, 5-7
2026-08-09vs PD55/Sari/PTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDruanne Freeman / Merryn Weaver vs Pat Gleaton / Gina Smith3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Grant / Katie Hensley vs Lynn McElveen / Kay Zobrist6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Gatlin / Crystal Rogers vs Cheryl Windham / Marie Player6-3, 6-4
2026-08-02vs PD55/Sari/PTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Hensley / Pat Pitiranggon vs Tanya Sari / Jody Murphy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Jones / Shelly Brand vs Annette McCaffrey / Raquel Lastimoso7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJo Ann Nance / Ophillia Dominique vs Lynn McElveen / Lyndy Graham3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD55/Nance/FTC1021225
2PD55/Sari/PTC0112428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Katie Hensley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Druanne Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Kell Culclasure
published
3.62
Elizabeth Mozley
published 4
3.60
Lola Bradshaw
published
3.47
Pat Pitiranggon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Jo Ann Nance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Shelly Brand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Kathy Gatlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Melissa Ellerbe
published
3.31
Tracie Cassidy
published
3.26
Ronelle van Heerden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Merryn Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Ophillia Dominique
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Marlene Ward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Grant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lola Bradshaw + Kell Culclasure6455% games+5.8% vs expected
Pat Pitiranggon + Ophillia Dominique8551% games−5.0% vs expected
Kathy Gatlin + Kell Culclasure2445% games−5.1% vs expected
Jo Ann Nance + Druanne Freeman3346% games−8.6% vs expected
Ophillia Dominique + Marlene Ward5158% gamesnot enough data
Ophillia Dominique + Melissa Ellerbe3350% gamesnot enough data
Katie Hensley + Pat Pitiranggon404 matchesnot enough data
Ronelle van Heerden + Pat Pitiranggon404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Hensley
43W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Druanne Freeman
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Kell Culclasure
27W–17L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Elizabeth Mozley
9W–12L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Lola Bradshaw
37W–35L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Pat Pitiranggon
43W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jo Ann Nance
18W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.44
Shelly Brand
24W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Kathy Gatlin
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.40
Melissa Ellerbe
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Tracie Cassidy
11W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Ronelle van Heerden
30W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Merryn Weaver
21W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Ophillia Dominique
41W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Marlene Ward
32W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
Shannon Grant
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.