Teams

PD55/Sari/PTC

2026 STA Adult Combo 55 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.71 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 13 5:30 PM
Dr. Eddie Floyd Florence Tennis Center
Sep 27 5:30 PM
Palmetto Tennis Center
2026-08-30vs PD55/Nance/FTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesTammy Achziger / Pat Gleaton vs Crystal Rogers / Kathy Gatlin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn McElveen / Lyndy Graham vs Ronelle van Heerden / Katie Hensley7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGina Smith / Marie Player vs Druanne Freeman / Marlene Ward7-5, 7-5
2026-08-09vs PD55/Nance/FTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesPat Gleaton / Gina Smith vs Druanne Freeman / Merryn Weaver6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLynn McElveen / Kay Zobrist vs Shannon Grant / Katie Hensley3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Windham / Marie Player vs Kathy Gatlin / Crystal Rogers3-6, 4-6
2026-08-02vs PD55/Nance/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTanya Sari / Jody Murphy vs Katie Hensley / Pat Pitiranggon2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette McCaffrey / Raquel Lastimoso vs Lisa Jones / Shelly Brand6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLynn McElveen / Lyndy Graham vs Jo Ann Nance / Ophillia Dominique6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD55/Nance/FTC1021225
2PD55/Sari/PTC0112428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
BJ Reed
published 4
3.71
Annette McCaffrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Cheryl Windham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Tammy Achziger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Lynn McElveen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Raquel Lastimoso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Tanya Sari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Kay Zobrist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Marie Player
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Amanda Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lyndy Graham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Jean Witt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Betsy Graham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Pat Gleaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jody Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Allison Patrick
published 3.5
2.82
Donna Rivers
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn McElveen + Lyndy Graham4161% games+12.6% vs expected
Raquel Lastimoso + Kay Zobrist20168% games+9.7% vs expected
Amanda Lane + Raquel Lastimoso5365% games+8.5% vs expected
Tammy Achziger + Tanya Sari2644% games+1.9% vs expected
Jean Witt + Betsy Graham4447% games−6.1% vs expected
Annette McCaffrey + Tanya Sari2343% gamesnot enough data
Marie Player + Pat Gleaton404 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Achziger + Annette McCaffrey314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
BJ Reed
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Annette McCaffrey
56W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Cheryl Windham
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Tammy Achziger
26W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Lynn McElveen
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Raquel Lastimoso
54W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.50
Tanya Sari
17W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kay Zobrist
77W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Marie Player
48W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Amanda Lane
33W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lyndy Graham
34W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Jean Witt
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Betsy Graham
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Pat Gleaton
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Jody Murphy
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Allison Patrick
24W–48L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Donna Rivers
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.