Teams

Baldwin-3.5

2024 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-14vs Single the FunLost 02
L#2 SinglesLeann Gibbs vs Eva Safrankova0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLisa Mulholland vs Erin O'Donovan6-7, 4-6
2024-10-29vs McVeighSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLisa Mulholland vs Nicole Gownley6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLeann Gibbs vs Allison Burt5-7, 6-7
2024-10-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesLeann Gibbs vs Allison Burt6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-09vs Lady Strikers SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLisa Mulholland vs Courtney Laughlin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCyndi Casey vs Colleen Quinlan4-6, 0-6
2024-10-06Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Mulholland vs Allison Burt2-6, 2-6
2024-10-03vs Single the FunWon 10
W#2 SinglesLisa Mulholland vs Tina Rohm6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-02vs Single the FunLost 02
L#1 SinglesDawn Orso vs Eva Safrankova6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCyndi Casey vs Emily Wilson4-6, 3-6
2024-09-29vs Lady Strikers SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesDawn Orso vs Ay Rothany Koballa6-2, 6-3
2024-09-09vs Lady Strikers SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesCyndi Casey vs Colleen Quinlan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lisa Mulholland
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Dawn Orso
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Meghan Miller
published
3.25
Leann Gibbs
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Deeann Coe
published 3.5
3.13
Cyndi Casey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leann Gibbs + Lisa Mulholland3350% games+1.6% vs expected
Cyndi Casey + Leann Gibbs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Mulholland
79W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Dawn Orso
48W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Meghan Miller
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Leann Gibbs
98W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Deeann Coe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cyndi Casey
66W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.